The influence of cooperation and competition on true and false recognition

Yansong Li,Xi Chen,Andrew J. Elliot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4216442/v1

2024-01-01

Abstract:Abstract Recent research has revealed that individuals’ true and false recognition is susceptible to social influence arising from competition. Although cooperation and competition represent two fundamental, opposing forms of social interaction, no work to date has examined how memory processes may be distorted by social influence arising from cooperation and whether these two interactive modes may exert similar or differential influences. To address these issues, participants randomly assigned to a competition, cooperation, or control group performed a pictorial variant of the Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm. We found that both the cooperation and competition groups showed significant false recognition reduction compared to the control group, while only the competition group showed true recognition reduction relative to the control group. Our signal-detection analysis further revealed that false recognition suppression driven by cooperation and competition is due to a combination of both a reduction in encoded memory information for critical lures and an increase in memory monitoring as evidenced by decreased sensitivity (d') and elevated response bias (C); competition-driven true recognition reduction, however, is due to enhanced monitoring as indexed by increased C. These results provide compelling evidence that cooperation and competition suppress participants’ false recognition by impairing relational encoding and by enhancing retrieval-based monitoring, while competition reduces participants’ true recognition by increasing retrieval-based monitoring. Collectively, these findings lay the foundation for deepening our understanding of how memory is susceptible to social influence arising from interactive contexts.