Abstract:Background and Aims: Adaptive behavior depends on the ability to voluntarily suppress context-inappropriate behaviors, a process referred to as response inhibition. Stop Signal tests (SSTs) are the most frequently studied paradigm used to assess response inhibition. Previous studies of SSTs have indicated that inhibitory control behavior can be explained using a common model in which GO and STOP processes are initiated independent from one and another, and the process that is completed first determines whether the behavior is elicited (GO process) or terminated (STOP process). Consistent with this model, studies have indicated that individuals strategically delay their behaviors during SSTs in order to increase their stopping abilities. Despite being controlled by distinct neural systems, prior studies have largely documented similar inhibitory control performance across eye and hand movements. Though, no existing studies have compared the extent to which individuals strategically delay behavior across different effectors is not yet clear. Here, we compared the extent to which inhibitory control processes and the cognitive strategies that support them during oculomotor and manual motor behaviors. Methods: We examined 29 healthy individuals who performed parallel oculomotor and manual motor SSTs. Participants also completed a separate block of GO trials administered prior to the Stop Signal tests to assess baseline reaction times for each effector and reaction time increases during interleaved GO trials of the SST. Results: Our results showed that stopping errors increased for both effectors as the interval between GO and STOP cues was increased (i.e., stop signal delay), but performance deteriorated more rapidly for eye compared to hand movements with increases in stop signal delay. During GO trials, participants delayed the initiation of their responses for each effector, and greater slowing of reaction times on GO trials was associated with increased accuracy on STOP trials for both effectors. However, participants delayed their eye movements to a lesser degree than their hand movements, and strategic reaction time slowing was a stronger determinant of stopping accuracy for hand compared to eye movements. Overall, stopping accuracies for eye and hand movements were only modestly correlated, and the time it took individuals to cancel a response was not related for eye and hand movements. Discussion and Conclusion: Our findings that GO and STOP processes are independent and that individuals strategically delay their behavioral responses to increase stopping accuracy regardless of effector indicate that inhibitory control of oculomotor and manual motor behaviors both follow common guiding principles. Yet, our findings document that eye movements are more difficult to inhibit than hand movements, and the timing, magnitude, and impact of cognitive control strategies used to support voluntary response inhibition are less robust for eye compared to hand movements. This suggests that inhibitory control systems also show unique characteristics that are behavior-dependent. This conclusion is consistent with neurophysiological evidence showing important differences in the architecture and functional properties of the neural systems involved in inhibitory control of eye and hand movements. It also suggests that characterizing inhibitory control processes in health and disease requires effector-specific analysis.

Influence of competition on motor inhibitory control: Evidence from a go/no-go task

Impulse Inhibition in People with Internet Addiction Disorder: Electrophysiological Evidence from a Go/NoGo Study.

A differential impact of action–effect temporal contiguity on different measures of response inhibition in the Go\No-Go and Stop-signal paradigms

Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the differential effect of reward prospect on response selection and inhibition

Go/No-Go Ratios Modulate Inhibition-Related Brain Activity: An Event-Related Potential Study

Individual differences in beta-band oscillations predict motor-inhibitory control

Unravelling the dynamics of response force: Investigating motor restraint and motor cancellation through go/no-go and stop-signal tasks

Neural substrates of behavioral inhibitory control during the two-choice oddball task: functional neuroimaging evidence

Motor Inhibition Impacts the Motor Interference Effect of Dangerous Objects Based on a Prime-Target Grasping Consistency Judgment Task.

Individual differences in the Simon effect are underpinned by differences in the competitive dynamics in the basal ganglia: An experimental verification and a computational model

Inhibitory Control Processes and the Strategies That Support Them During Hand and Eye Movements.

The influence of cooperation and competition on true and false recognition

Reward Facilitates Response Conflict Resolution Via Global Motor Inhibition: Electromyography Evidence

The field of expertise modulates the time course of neural processes associated with inhibitory control in a sport decision-making task

Motor inhibition errors and interference suppression errors differ systematically on neural and behavioural features of response monitoring

Neural mechanism of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo tasks

Unconscious impulsivity control maintains the ability of behavioral inhibitory control in males: Evidence of reaction-time cost

Leveling the Field for a Fairer Race between Going and Stopping: Neural Evidence for the Race Model of Motor Inhibition from a New Version of the Stop Signal Task

Inhibitory Control in Excessive Social Networking Users: Evidence From an Event-Related Potential-Based Go-Nogo Task

Response Inhibition or Evaluation of Danger? an Event-Related Potential Study Regarding the Origin of the Motor Interference Effect from Dangerous Objects.

Desire for Success Awakens: Proof of Competence Restoration in a Non-competitive Environment