Surface Evolution of Lithium Titanate upon Electrochemical Cycling Using a Combination of Surface Specific Characterization Techniques

Jokin Rikarte,Begoña Acebedo,Arantxa Vilalta‐Clemente,Francisco Bonilla,Angus J. Wilkinson,Montserrat Galceran,Arturo Lousa,Juan Rubio‐Zuazo,Miguel Ángel Muñoz‐Márquez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201902164
IF: 5.4
2020-04-22
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Abstract:<p>Among the electrodes for Li‐ion batteries, Li<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> (LTO) stands out as anode owing to its stability and safety, in part ascribed to its low surface reactivity. However, the overlayer formation on the LTO surface upon electrochemical cycling is reported in recent years; a rough surface layer of electrochemically inactive α‐Li<sub>2</sub>TiO<sub>3</sub> on top of the LTO (111) surface is suggested on the grounds of scanning probe techniques and theoretical ab initio calculations which would negatively strike on the battery performance. Hence the investigation of the LTO surface evolution is key to achieve more stable and safer Li‐ion batteries. LTO (111) thin film electrodes are used as model system where a variety of surface specific characterization techniques are applied to unveil the surface behavior of LTO in Li‐ion batteries. In contrast with previous studies, with the help of high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy and synchrotron‐based surface X‐ray diffraction, α‐Li<sub>2</sub>TiO<sub>3</sub> is found to be a surface preparation product. Of special importance is the use of high‐resolution electron backscatter diffraction to report an increase on the LTO surface strain upon electrochemical cycling which can have a critical effect in long cycling performance of LTO that is always considered a zero‐strain material.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?