Too Hot to Handle?: Native Advertising and the Firestone Dilemma
Lee Silberberg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897172
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Native advertisements are advertisements that mimic the format and content of non-paid for content that surrounds them. Instead of interrupting the content being consumed, native advertisements become part of that content—they are largely indistinguishable from other tweets, posts, videos, and pictures appearing on a given platform. Because of this unique format, native advertisements are often content that consumers want to engage with. This reformulation of advertising has radically remade the process of persuading consumers to act, believe, and consume. And, over the past two decades, native advertising has become both a ubiquitous part of everyday content consumption and an ever-growing, billion-dollar industry. Unfortunately for consumers, native advertising is also very deceptive. While most people believe they differentiate native advertising from non-advertising content, that is unfortunately not the case. To make matters worse, most native advertising does not include a disclosure that it is advertising—and even when a disclosure is present, most consumers still fail to recognize the content as advertising. To paraphrase contemporary native advertising scholars, we live in a world where consumers cannot tell an advertisement and a non-advertisement apart.To control native advertising deception, the Federal Trade Commission has promulgated numerous subregulatory guidance documents, initiated enforcement actions, and engaged with regulated parties through educational events. The FTC’s goal has been to ensure that native advertising is transparent to consumers and that consumer deception from native advertising falls below 15% consumer deception—the threshold established in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal Trade Commission. The outcome of these concerted efforts is an array of unclear, even contradictory guidelines that have worked against achieving the FTC’s goals.This Note proposes that the FTC adopt an easily met strict liability framework for native advertising disclosure. That framework would require that each native advertisement have a disclosure with three elements: (1) the disclosure must include the language “Paid Advertisement” or “Paid Ad”; (2) the disclosure must include the name (and also logo, if available) of the party paying for the advertisement; (3) the first and second elements must be in close proximity to each other and to the advertisement itself. This Note argues the FTC should adopt this framework because it is empirically likely to reduce native advertising deception below the Firestone threshold. Furthermore, this framework will also produce simple, clear guidelines that balance the FTC’s consumer protection interests with the commercial interests of regulated parties.