Abstract:Native advertisements are advertisements that mimic the format and content of non-paid for content that surrounds them. Instead of interrupting the content being consumed, native advertisements become part of that content—they are largely indistinguishable from other tweets, posts, videos, and pictures appearing on a given platform. Because of this unique format, native advertisements are often content that consumers want to engage with. This reformulation of advertising has radically remade the process of persuading consumers to act, believe, and consume. And, over the past two decades, native advertising has become both a ubiquitous part of everyday content consumption and an ever-growing, billion-dollar industry. Unfortunately for consumers, native advertising is also very deceptive. While most people believe they differentiate native advertising from non-advertising content, that is unfortunately not the case. To make matters worse, most native advertising does not include a disclosure that it is advertising—and even when a disclosure is present, most consumers still fail to recognize the content as advertising. To paraphrase contemporary native advertising scholars, we live in a world where consumers cannot tell an advertisement and a non-advertisement apart.To control native advertising deception, the Federal Trade Commission has promulgated numerous subregulatory guidance documents, initiated enforcement actions, and engaged with regulated parties through educational events. The FTC’s goal has been to ensure that native advertising is transparent to consumers and that consumer deception from native advertising falls below 15% consumer deception—the threshold established in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal Trade Commission. The outcome of these concerted efforts is an array of unclear, even contradictory guidelines that have worked against achieving the FTC’s goals.This Note proposes that the FTC adopt an easily met strict liability framework for native advertising disclosure. That framework would require that each native advertisement have a disclosure with three elements: (1) the disclosure must include the language “Paid Advertisement” or “Paid Ad”; (2) the disclosure must include the name (and also logo, if available) of the party paying for the advertisement; (3) the first and second elements must be in close proximity to each other and to the advertisement itself. This Note argues the FTC should adopt this framework because it is empirically likely to reduce native advertising deception below the Firestone threshold. Furthermore, this framework will also produce simple, clear guidelines that balance the FTC’s consumer protection interests with the commercial interests of regulated parties.

The Role of a Companion Banner and Sponsorship Transparency in Recognizing and Evaluating Article-style Native Advertising

The Deceptiveness of Sponsored News Articles

Native advertising effectiveness: The role of congruence and consumer annoyance on clicks, bounces, and visits

Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising

Reducing Native Advertising Deception: Revisiting the Antecedents and Consequences of Persuasion Knowledge in Digital News Contexts

Improving Consumers' Ability to Detect Native Advertising Using Identified Disclosure

Native Advertising: Is Deception an Asset or a Liability?

The effects of disclosure format on native advertising recognition and audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers

Native Advertising in Online News: Trade-Offs Among Clicks, Brand Recognition, and Website Trustworthiness

Unguarded against Persuasion and Willing to Share: The Combined Effect of Chronic Regulatory Focus and Disclosure Language on Consumer Responses to Native Advertising

Can US advertising students recognize an ad in editorial’s clothing (native advertising)? A partial replication of the Stanford “Evaluating information” test

Sponsorship Disclosure in Native Advertising: A Theoretical Framework

Consumers’ responses to native vs. banner advertising: moderation of persuasion knowledge on interaction effects of ad type and placement type

Ad Disclosure vs. Ad Recognition: How Persuasion Knowledge Influences Native Advertising Evaluation

Native and embedded advertising formats: Tensions between a lucrative marketing strategy and consumer fairness

Too Hot to Handle?: Native Advertising and the Firestone Dilemma

The Covert Advertising Recognition and Effects (CARE) model: Processes of persuasion in native advertising and other masked formats

Avoidance and Acceptance of Native Advertising on Social Media: Applications of Consumer Social Intelligence, Persuasion Knowledge, and the Typology of Consumer Responses

The role of relevancy in native advertising on social media

In-Feed Native Advertising on News Websites: Effects of Advertising Format, Website Reputation, and Product Involvement

How advertising relevance and consumer–Brand relationship strength limit disclosure effects of native ads on Twitter