Abstract:Strategic decision-making in uncertain and adversarial environments is crucial for the security of modern systems and infrastructures. A salient feature of many optimal decision-making policies is a level of unpredictability, or randomness, which helps to keep an adversary uncertain about the system's defensive strategies. This paper seeks to explore decision-making policies on the other end of the spectrum – namely, whether there are benefits in revealing one's strategic intentions to an opponent before engaging in competition. We study these scenarios in a well-studied model of competitive resource allocation problem known as General Lotto games. In the classic formulation, two competing players simultaneously allocate their assets to a set of battlefields, and the resulting payoffs are derived in a zero-sum fashion. Here, we consider a three-stage extension where one of the players has the option to publicly pre-commit assets in a binding fashion to battlefields before play begins. In response, the opponent decides which of these battlefields to secure (or abandon) by matching the pre-commitment with its own assets. They then engage in a General Lotto game over the remaining set of battlefields. Interestingly, this paper highlights many scenarios where strategically revealing intentions in this fashion can actually significantly improve one's payoff. Thus, we show pre-commitments can serve as alternate decision-making policies that contrast with conventional policies where randomness is the central component of strategy in adversarial environments.

Generalizations of the General Lotto and Colonel Blotto games

A General Lotto game with asymmetric budget uncertainty

Multiplayer General Lotto game

Discrete Colonel Blotto and General Lotto games

Characterizing the interplay between information and strength in Blotto games

General Lotto Games with Scouts: Information versus Strength

Asymmetric Battlefield Uncertainty in General Lotto Games

Reinforcement Strategies in General Lotto Games

Colonel Blotto Games with Favoritism: Competitions with Pre-allocations and Asymmetric Effectiveness

Blotto Games with Costly Winnings

Strategic investments in multi-stage General Lotto games

Distributed Generalized Nash Equilibrium Seeking: An Operator-Theoretic Perspective

Stackelberg vs. Nash in the Lottery Colonel Blotto Game

The Value of Compromising Strategic Intent in General Lotto Games

An Equilibrium Analysis of the Arad-Rubinstein Game

Strategically revealing capabilities in General Lotto games

Strategically revealing intentions in General Lotto Games

Multi-battle contests over complementary battlefields

Blotto on the Ballot: A Ballot Stuffing Blotto Game

Colonel Blotto Game: An Analysis and Extension to Networks