Abstract:This paper studies contests with complementary prizes where each agent simultaneously distributes a fixed budget over multiple battlefields. Each battlefield has a single prize which is divided among the competitors in proportion to an arbitrary power function of their investment levels. A unique pure strategy Nash equilibrium is shown to exist under arbitrarily sensitive battlefield success functions if objective functions exhibit constant subunitary elasticity of substitution between prize shares. In contrast, Blotto contests with linear objectives have only mixed strategy Nash equilibria if battlefield success functions are sufficiently sensitive to investment levels. Sufficient complementarity between prize shares allows pure strategy Nash equilibria to exist under arbitrarily sensitive battlefield success functions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper studies the issue of competition across multiple battlefields, where each agent simultaneously allocates a fixed budget across several battlefields. Each battlefield has a single prize, which is distributed according to some power function based on the investment levels of the competitors. The main goal of the paper is to explore whether there exists a Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium (PSNE) in such multi-battlefield competitions when the prizes are complementary, and to investigate the properties of these equilibria.
### Specific Problem Description
1. **Complementarity of Prizes**:
- The prizes in the study are complementary, meaning the value of a resource to an agent depends on the other resources it possesses. For example, military factions compete for both air superiority and ground superiority, and social media platforms compete for both users and advertisers.
2. **Budget Allocation Strategy**:
- Each agent needs to allocate resources across multiple battlefields within a fixed budget. The share of the prize in each battlefield is distributed according to some power function based on the investment levels of the agents.
3. **Existence of Nash Equilibrium**:
- The paper explores whether a Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium exists when the prizes are complementary. Specifically, it examines whether a PSNE can be guaranteed when the objective function exhibits Constant Subunitary Elasticity of Substitution (CES).
4. **Comparison with Traditional Blotto Competition**:
- In traditional Blotto competitions, if the success function is sufficiently sensitive to investment levels and the objective function is linear, a PSNE does not exist. However, in this paper, the authors demonstrate that when the prizes are complementary, a PSNE can exist even if the success function is highly sensitive to investment levels.
### Main Contributions
- **Existence of Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium**:
- The authors prove that when the prizes are complementary and the objective function exhibits Constant Subunitary Elasticity of Substitution, there exists a unique Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium.
- **Pareto Efficiency**:
- It is proven that the unique PSNE is Pareto efficient among all feasible outcomes, meaning no other strategy combination can make all agents better off.
- **Minimax Payoff in the Two-Agent Case**:
- In the case of two agents, the Nash equilibrium payoff is the minimax payoff, meaning any deviation from the equilibrium strategy will be exploited by the opponent to achieve a higher payoff than the equilibrium.
### Application Background
- **Military Strategy**:
- In military factions competing for air and ground superiority, the resource allocation strategy directly impacts the final victory.
- **Sharing Economy**:
- For example, ride-hailing companies need to attract both passengers and drivers, and the resource allocation strategy affects the overall revenue of the company.
- **Pharmaceutical Industry**:
- Pharmaceutical companies need to persuade both doctors and patients to accept their products, and the resource allocation strategy directly impacts market share.
Through these studies, the paper provides a theoretical foundation for understanding resource allocation strategies in multi-battlefield competitions and offers guidance for decision-making in practical applications.