Abstract:Background: Collaborative learning is recognized as an effective learning tool in the classroom. In order to optimize the collaborative learning experience for children within a collaborative partnership, it is important to understand how to match the children by ability level, and whether assigning roles within these dyads is beneficial or not. Aims: The current study investigated the effect of partnering children with different task-specific abilities and assigning or not assigning helping roles within the dyads on the quality of talk used in a collaborative learning task. Sample: The participants in this study comprised 54 year 6 pupils from a Western Sydney government primary school (boys=26, girls=28). The ages ranged from 10 years 10 months to 12 years 4 months with a mean age of 11 years 4 months. Method: The children were formed into 27 single sex dyads of low-middle- and low-high-ability partnerships. In half of each of these dyads the higher ability partner was asked to help the lower ability partner, which was compared with just asking partners to work together. The quality of talk used by the dyads while working collaboratively on the problem-solving task was analysed using a language analysis framework developed by Mercer and colleagues (e.g. Littleton et al., 2005; Mercer, 1994, 1996). Results: Results of this study found that children who worked collaboratively in the low-middle-ability dyad condition demonstrated significantly more high-quality exploratory talk than those in the low-high-ability dyad condition. Although there was no significant difference between dyads who were assigned roles and those who were asked to work together, there was an interaction trend which suggests that low-high-ability dyads, who were given the roles of helper and learner, showed more exploratory talk than dyads who were asked just to work together. Conclusion: Mercer's re-conceptualization of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in terms of the Intermental Development Zone (IDZ), which is reliant on constructive challenging discourse, can potentially provide a platform upon which all learners in the classroom can benefit from collaborative learning experiences.

It takes two: Teaching essential social skills by examining history’s dynamic duos

Three Contrasting Pairs’ Collaborative Programming Processes in China’s Secondary Education

How to Co-Teach Like Dance Partners

Using Shared Story Reading in Mathematics

Paired teaching for faculty professional development in teaching

Pair- versus solo-programming of mini-games as a setting for learning to program: An Action Research approach

A Collaborative Approach to Developing an Interdisciplinary Unit

Cooperative Team Learning and the Development of Social Skills in Higher Education: The Variables Involved

Inclusive Teamwork for Pupils with Speech, Language and Communication Needs

Making Social Studies Social: Engaging Students Through Different Forms of Social Perspective Taking

The Future of AI in Education: AI Classroom Partners

Effects of a Social Skills Intervention among High School Students with Intellectual Disabilities and Autism and Their General Education Peers

An Examination of Social Skills Instruction in the Context of Small-Group Reading

Teaching with robotics: creating and implementing integrated units in middle school subjects

Towards effective partnerships in a collaborative problem-solving task

Enhancing Computer Science Education with Pair Programming and Problem Solving Studios

Pairing Students in Clinical Assignments to Develop Collaboration and Communication Skills

A New Textbook Design in Language Teaching: Plurimethodological Pair-unit

Teaching Social Interaction Skills in the Integrated Preschool

The nine dynamics of mutual aid in social work group education: reflections and lessons from a low residency cohort model project

Teaming and Teaching in ECE: Neoliberal Reforms, Teacher Metaphors, and Identity in Head Start