Abstract:In estimating the average treatment effect in observational studies, the influence of confounders should be appropriately addressed. To this end, the propensity score is widely used. If the propensity scores are known for all the subjects, bias due to confounders can be adjusted by using the inverse probability weighting (IPW) by the propensity score. Since the propensity score is unknown in general, it is usually estimated by the parametric logistic regression model with unknown parameters estimated by solving the score equation under the strongly ignorable treatment assignment (SITA) assumption. Violation of the SITA assumption and/or misspecification of the propensity score model can cause serious bias in estimating the average treatment effect. To relax the SITA assumption, the IPW estimator based on the outcome-dependent propensity score has been successfully introduced. However, it still depends on the correctly specified parametric model and its identification. In this paper, we propose a simple sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounders. In the standard practice, the estimating equation is used to estimate the unknown parameters in the parametric propensity score model. Our idea is to make inference on the average causal effect by removing restrictive parametric model assumptions while still utilizing the estimating equation. Using estimating equations as constraints, which the true propensity scores asymptotically satisfy, we construct the worst-case bounds for the average treatment effect with linear programming. Different from the existing sensitivity analysis methods, we construct the worst-case bounds with minimal assumptions. We illustrate our proposal by simulation studies and a real-world example.

Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding

Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation

Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in the Estimation of Marginal Causal Effects

A simple sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounders via linear programming with estimating equation constraints

Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias

Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effect to Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies with Survival and Competing Risks Outcomes

Sensitivity analysis for incomplete data via unmeasured confounding

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

Sensitivity analysis for the generalization of experimental results

A flexible sensitivity analysis approach for unmeasured confounding with multiple treatments and a binary outcome with application to SEER-Medicare lung cancer data

Use of Sensitivity Analyses to Assess Uncontrolled Confounding from Unmeasured Variables in Observational, Active Comparator Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies: A Systematic Review

Real Effect or Bias? Good Practices for Evaluating the Robustness of Evidence From Comparative Observational Studies Through Quantitative Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding

[Sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounding interference in observational study]

Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding

Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time

Studentized sensitivity analysis for the sample average treatment effect in paired observational studies

Conformal Sensitivity Analysis for Individual Treatment Effects

Sensitivity Analysis of Individual Treatment Effects: A Robust Conformal Inference Approach

Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in dynamic treatment regimes

Addressing the Influence of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies with Time-to-Event Outcomes: A Semiparametric Sensitivity Analysis Approach