Abstract:BACKGROUND:Estimating the average effect of a treatment, exposure, or intervention on health outcomes is a primary aim of many medical studies. However, unbalanced covariates between groups can lead to confounding bias when using observational data to estimate the average treatment effect (ATE). In this study, we proposed an estimator to correct confounding bias and provide multiple protection for estimation consistency.METHODS:With reference to the kernel function-based double-index propensity score (Ker.DiPS) estimator, we proposed the artificial neural network-based multi-index propensity score (ANN.MiPS) estimator. The ANN.MiPS estimator employed the artificial neural network to estimate the MiPS that combines the information from multiple candidate models for propensity score and outcome regression. A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the performance of the proposed ANN.MiPS estimator. Furthermore, we applied our estimator to real data to discuss its practicability.RESULTS:The simulation study showed the bias of the ANN.MiPS estimators is very small and the standard error is similar if any one of the candidate models is correctly specified under all evaluated sample sizes, treatment rates, and covariate types. Compared to the kernel function-based estimator, the ANN.MiPS estimator usually yields smaller standard error when the correct model is incorporated in the estimator. The empirical study indicated the point estimation for ATE and its bootstrap standard error of the ANN.MiPS estimator is stable under different model specifications.CONCLUSIONS:The proposed estimator extended the combination of information from two models to multiple models and achieved multiply robust estimation for ATE. Extra efficiency was gained by our estimator compared to the kernel-based estimator. The proposed estimator provided a novel approach for estimating the causal effects in observational studies.

A simple sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounders via linear programming with estimating equation constraints

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Variance Reduction for Causal Inference

Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation

Robust Estimation of Causal Effects Via a High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Estimation of Average Treatment Effect Based on a Multi-Index Propensity Score.

Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing

Estimating Average Treatment Effects with Continuous and Discrete Covariates: The Case of Swan-Ganz Catheterization

Robust nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects: A propensity score‐based varying coefficient approach

Semiparametric Estimation for Average Causal Effects Using Propensity Score-Based Spline

A Simple and Efficient Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounders

A robust and efficient approach to causal inference based on sparse sufficient dimension reduction

On IPW-based Estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects

Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Inverse Propensity Weighting via Quantile Balancing

Model-assisted inference for treatment effects using regularized calibrated estimation with high-dimensional data

Debiased Inverse Propensity Score Weighting for Estimation of Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Confounders

Augmented Inverse Probability Weighted Estimation for Conditional Treatment Effect

Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effect to Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies with Survival and Competing Risks Outcomes

Globally Efficient Non-Parametric Inference of Average Treatment Effects by Empirical Balancing Calibration Weighting