Abstract:Causal mediation analysis techniques enable investigators to examine whether the effect of the exposure on an outcome is mediated by some intermediate variable. Motivated by a data example from epidemiology, we consider estimation of natural direct and indirect effects on a survival outcome. An important concern is bias from confounders that may be unmeasured. Estimating natural direct and indirect effects requires an elaborate series of assumptions in order to identify the target quantities. The analyst must carefully measure and adjust for important predictors of the exposure, mediator and outcome. Omitting important confounders may bias the results in a way that is difficult to predict. In recent years, several methods have been proposed to explore sensitivity to unmeasured confounding in mediation analysis. However, many of these methods limit complexity by relying on a handful of sensitivity parameters that are difficult to interpret, or alternatively, by assuming that specific patterns of unmeasured confounding are absent. Instead, we propose a simple Bayesian sensitivity analysis technique that is indexed by four bias parameters. Our method has the unique advantage that it is able to simultaneously assess unmeasured confounding in the mediator–outcome, exposure–outcome and exposure–mediator relationships. It is a natural Bayesian extension of the sensitivity analysis methodologies of VanderWeele, which have been widely used in the epidemiology literature. We present simulation findings, and additionally, we illustrate the method in an epidemiological study of mortality rates in criminal offenders from British Columbia.

Addressing the Influence of Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies with Time-to-Event Outcomes: A Semiparametric Sensitivity Analysis Approach

Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effect to Unmeasured Confounding in Observational Studies with Survival and Competing Risks Outcomes

Evaluating costs with unmeasured confounding: A sensitivity analysis for the treatment effect

Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding

Sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in estimating the difference in restricted mean survival time

Semi-Parametric Sensitivity Analysis for Trials with Irregular and Informative Assessment Times

Sensitivity Analysis for Effects of Multiple Exposures in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding: Non‐Gaussian and Time‐to‐Event Outcomes

A flexible sensitivity analysis approach for unmeasured confounding with multiple treatments and a binary outcome with application to SEER-Medicare lung cancer data

A multistate approach for mediation analysis in the presence of semi-competing risks with application in cancer survival disparities

Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in the Estimation of Marginal Causal Effects

Matching methods for obtaining survival functions to estimate the effect of a time-dependent treatment

Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation

[Sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounding interference in observational study]

Data-Driven Simulations to Assess the Impact of Study Imperfections in Time-to-Event Analyses

Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in dynamic treatment regimes

A Semiparametric Approach to Model Effect Modification

Estimating the marginal effect of a continuous exposure on an ordinal outcome using data subject to covariate‐driven treatment and visit processes

Causal effect estimation in survival analysis with high dimensional confounders

Real Effect or Bias? Good Practices for Evaluating the Robustness of Evidence From Comparative Observational Studies Through Quantitative Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding