Abstract:In this article, we aim to provide a general and complete understanding of semi-supervised (SS) causal inference for treatment effects. Specifically, we consider two such estimands: (a) the average treatment effect and (b) the quantile treatment effect, as prototype cases, in an SS setting, characterized by two available data sets: (i) a labeled data set of size $n$, providing observations for a response and a set of high dimensional covariates, as well as a binary treatment indicator; and (ii) an unlabeled data set of size $N$, much larger than $n$, but without the response observed. Using these two data sets, we develop a family of SS estimators which are ensured to be: (1) more robust and (2) more efficient than their supervised counterparts based on the labeled data set only. Beyond the 'standard' double robustness results (in terms of consistency) that can be achieved by supervised methods as well, we further establish root-n consistency and asymptotic normality of our SS estimators whenever the propensity score in the model is correctly specified, without requiring specific forms of the nuisance functions involved. Such an improvement of robustness arises from the use of the massive unlabeled data, so it is generally not attainable in a purely supervised setting. In addition, our estimators are shown to be semi-parametrically efficient as long as all the nuisance functions are correctly specified. Moreover, as an illustration of the nuisance estimators, we consider inverse-probability-weighting type kernel smoothing estimators involving unknown covariate transformation mechanisms, and establish in high dimensional scenarios novel results on their uniform convergence rates, which should be of independent interest. Numerical results on both simulated and real data validate the advantage of our methods over their supervised counterparts with respect to both robustness and efficiency.

Doubly-Valid/Doubly-Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Inference with Unmeasured Confounding

Multiply robust causal inference with double-negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding

Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions

Model-assisted sensitivity analysis for treatment effects under unmeasured confounding via regularized calibrated estimation

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

Doubly Robust Proximal Causal Inference under Confounded Outcome-Dependent Sampling

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Sensitivity Analysis via the Proportion of Unmeasured Confounding

Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Inverse Propensity Weighting via Quantile Balancing

Doubly Robust Estimation in Causal Inference with Missing Outcomes: with an Application to the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study

Sharp Bounds on Causal Effects in Case-Control and Cohort Studies

Model-Agnostic Covariate-Assisted Inference on Partially Identified Causal Effects

Two Robust Tools for Inference about Causal Effects with Invalid Instruments

Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models

A General Framework for Treatment Effect Estimation in Semi-Supervised and High Dimensional Settings

Extended Sensitivity Analysis for Heterogeneous Unmeasured Confounding with An Application to Sibling Studies of Returns to Education

Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in the Estimation of Marginal Causal Effects

Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner

Approximate Causal Effect Identification under Weak Confounding

Structure-agnostic Optimality of Doubly Robust Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation

Penalized Semiparametric Estimation for Causal Inference with Possibly Invalid Instruments