Abstract:Several ASTM standards on the fracture of glued and welded joints need attention because they do not consider the Griffith energy criterion of cracking which was proposed a century ago. It is almost as if Griffith never existed because the ASTM definition of failure is the stress criterion postulated by Galileo in 1638 in which stress at failure (i.e. strength = force/area) is defined as the determinant of fracture. Irene Martinez Villegas (Villegas, Rans 2021 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20200296. ( doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0296 )) shows in this volume that attempts to use ASTM D5868 to standardize welded composite (carbon fibre reinforced polymer, CFRP) lap joints reveal major problems. First, the test is a low angle bend–peel test; not shear. Second, the energy required to break the joint is not emphasized so that joints may have high strength properties but also low toughness; third, the fracture force is not proportional to the lap joint area so the concept of strength independent of sample size is false; fourth, as the CFRP panels are made thicker, the strength rises at constant overlap area so the strength can be any value you want; fifth, the strength of larger joints goes down; this is the size effect noted in many bend-cracking tests, much as Galileo suggested for bent beam fracture in his famous book ‘the larger the machine, the greater its weakness'. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that poor ASTM ‘shear strength’ standards should be replaced by a definition of welded lap joint performance based on Griffith's energy conservation argument in which fracture surface energy is the main parameter resisting failure. The foundation of this Griffith-style lap joint analysis for long cracks goes back to 1975 but has been largely ignored until now because it does not fit the Griffith equation for cracked sheets, has no ‘stress intensity factor’, and travels at constant speed, not accelerating like the standard Griffith tension crack. This study of tensile delamination shows that a long lap crack is not driven by stress near the crack but by changes in stored elastic energy in the stretched strips remote from the crack tip, while strain energy release rate is negative. It would be more appropriate to call this lap failure a tensile delamination crack. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘A cracking approach to inventing new tough materials: fracture stranger than friction’.

Energy release rate of a single edge cracked specimen subjected to large deformation

Energizing ASTM lap joint fracture standards

Energy-Based Crack Initiation Criterion for Viscoelastoplastic Materials with Distributed Cracks

Essential work of fracture of soft elastomers

How to Obtain a More Accurate Maximum Energy Release Rate for Mixed Mode Fracture

A finite crack growth energy release rate for elastic-plastic fracture

Influence Of Cyclic Softening On The Energy Release Rate Of An Edge Crack Under Simple Tension

Nonlinear Fracture Analysis of Delamination Crack Jumps in Laminated Composites

Effects Of Notch Geometry On The Local Cleavage Fracture Stress Sigma(F)

Fracture of dual crosslink gels with permanent and transient crosslinks

Local and global energy release rates for an electrically yielded crack in a piezoelectric ceramic

Crack-tip Constraint Analysis of SENB Specimen under Creep Condition

Rectangular Tensile Sheet with Double Edge Notch Cracks

Energy release rate in bimaterial specimens tested in pure modes I and II

The single edge notch fracture test for viscoelastic elastomers

The surface-forming energy release rate based fracture criterion for elastic-plastic crack propagation

Dynamic elastic-plastic fem analysis of a fracture specimen under plane stress state

On the experimental measurement of fracture toughness in SENT rubber specimens

A Unified Atomic Energy Release Rate Criterion for Nonlinear Brittle Fracture in Graphene Nanoribbons

Evaluating fracture energy predictions using phase-field and gradient-enhanced damage models for elastomers

A Generalized Maximum Energy Release Rate Criterion for Mixed Mode Fracture Analysis of Brittle and Quasi-Brittle Materials