Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy – An evaluation of dosimetric performances
Till Tobias Böhlen,Jean-François Germond,Laurent Desorgher,Izabella Veres,Andreas Bratel,Eric Landström,Erik Engwall,Fernanda G Herrera,Esat Mahmut Ozsahin,Jean Bourhis,François Bochud,Raphaël Moeckli,Jean‐François Germond,Fernanda G. Herrera
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110177
IF: 6.901
2024-02-20
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:Purpose Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. Methods Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. Results Like TP, VHEE above 100MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ±20%) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. 10cm-diameter electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. Conclusions VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging