Abstract:The presence, magnitude, and significance of sex differences in the human brain are hotly debated topics in the scientific community and popular media. This debate is largely fueled by studies containing strong, opposing conclusions: either little to no evidence exists for sex differences in human neuroanatomy, or there are small-to-moderate differences in the size of certain brain regions that are highly reproducible across cohorts (even after controlling for sex differences in average brain size). Our Commentary uses the specific comparison between two recent large-scale studies that adopt these opposing views—namely the review by Eliot and colleagues (2021) and the direct analysis of ~ 40k brains by Williams and colleagues (2021)—in an effort to clarify this controversy and provide a framework for conducting this research. First, we review observations that motivate research on sex differences in human neuroanatomy, including potential causes (evolutionary, genetic, and environmental) and effects (epidemiological and clinical evidence for sex-biased brain disorders). We also summarize methodological and empirical support for using structural MRI to investigate such patterns. Next, we outline how researchers focused on sex differences can better specify their study design (e.g., how sex was defined, if and how brain size was adjusted for) and results (by e.g., distinguishing sexual dimorphisms from sex differences). We then compare the different approaches available for studying sex differences across a large number of individuals: direct analysis, meta-analysis, and review. We stress that reviews do not account for methodological differences across studies, and that this variation explains many of the apparent inconsistencies reported throughout recent reviews (including the work by Eliot and colleagues). For instance, we show that amygdala volume is consistently reported as male-biased in studies with sufficient sample sizes and appropriate methods for brain size correction. In fact, comparing the results from multiple large direct analyses highlights small, highly reproducible sex differences in the volume of many brain regions (controlling for brain size). Finally, we describe best practices for the presentation and interpretation of these findings. Care in interpretation is important for all domains of science, but especially so for research on sex differences in the human brain, given the existence of broad societal gender-biases and a history of biological data being used justify sexist ideas. As such, we urge researchers to discuss their results from simultaneously scientific and anti-sexist viewpoints.

The sexual brain, genes, and cognition: A machine‐predicted brain sex score explains individual differences in cognitive intelligence and genetic influence in young children

Brain functional connectivity, but not neuroanatomy, captures the interrelationship between sex and gender in preadolescents

Multimodal data revealed different neurobiological correlates of intelligence between males and females

Deep Learning Models Reveal Replicable, Generalizable, and Behaviorally Relevant Sex Differences in Human Functional Brain Organization.

Gender Differences in Connectome-based Predictions of Individualized Intelligence Quotient and Sub-domain Scores.

A sex-stratified analysis of the genetic architecture of human brain anatomy

Sex, gender diversity, and brain structure in early adolescence

Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure at Birth

Sex-biased gene and microRNA expression in the developing mouse brain is associated with neurodevelopmental functions and neurological phenotypes

Polygenic architecture of brain structure and function, behaviors, and psychopathologies in children

Grey and white matter metrics demonstrate distinct and complementary prediction of differences in cognitive performance in children: Findings from ABCD (N= 11 876)

Integrative structural, functional, and transcriptomic analyses of sex-biased brain organization in humans

Longitudinally stable, brain-based predictive models mediate the relationships between childhood cognition and socio-demographic, psychological and genetic factors

Deep learning with diffusion MRI as in vivo microscope reveals sex-related differences in human white matter microstructure

Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: a multi-site replication analysis

Modeling brain sex in the limbic system as phenotype for female-prevalent mental disorders

Sex differences in the human brain: a roadmap for more careful analysis and interpretation of a biological reality

Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants

Sex differences in predicting fluid intelligence of adolescent brain from T1-weighted MRIs

Sex-biased gene expression during neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells

Predicting sex, age, general cognition and mental health with machine learning on brain structural connectomes