Abstract:The presence, magnitude, and significance of sex differences in the human brain are hotly debated topics in the scientific community and popular media. This debate is largely fueled by studies containing strong, opposing conclusions: either little to no evidence exists for sex differences in human neuroanatomy, or there are small-to-moderate differences in the size of certain brain regions that are highly reproducible across cohorts (even after controlling for sex differences in average brain size). Our Commentary uses the specific comparison between two recent large-scale studies that adopt these opposing views—namely the review by Eliot and colleagues (2021) and the direct analysis of ~ 40k brains by Williams and colleagues (2021)—in an effort to clarify this controversy and provide a framework for conducting this research. First, we review observations that motivate research on sex differences in human neuroanatomy, including potential causes (evolutionary, genetic, and environmental) and effects (epidemiological and clinical evidence for sex-biased brain disorders). We also summarize methodological and empirical support for using structural MRI to investigate such patterns. Next, we outline how researchers focused on sex differences can better specify their study design (e.g., how sex was defined, if and how brain size was adjusted for) and results (by e.g., distinguishing sexual dimorphisms from sex differences). We then compare the different approaches available for studying sex differences across a large number of individuals: direct analysis, meta-analysis, and review. We stress that reviews do not account for methodological differences across studies, and that this variation explains many of the apparent inconsistencies reported throughout recent reviews (including the work by Eliot and colleagues). For instance, we show that amygdala volume is consistently reported as male-biased in studies with sufficient sample sizes and appropriate methods for brain size correction. In fact, comparing the results from multiple large direct analyses highlights small, highly reproducible sex differences in the volume of many brain regions (controlling for brain size). Finally, we describe best practices for the presentation and interpretation of these findings. Care in interpretation is important for all domains of science, but especially so for research on sex differences in the human brain, given the existence of broad societal gender-biases and a history of biological data being used justify sexist ideas. As such, we urge researchers to discuss their results from simultaneously scientific and anti-sexist viewpoints.

Deep Learning Models Reveal Replicable, Generalizable, and Behaviorally Relevant Sex Differences in Human Functional Brain Organization.

Deep learning with diffusion MRI as in vivo microscope reveals sex-related differences in human white matter microstructure

Brain Differences Between Men and Women: Evidence From Deep Learning.

Using Organoids to Model Sex Differences in the Human Brain

Integrative structural, functional, and transcriptomic analyses of sex-biased brain organization in humans

Sex differences in the human brain: a roadmap for more careful analysis and interpretation of a biological reality

Brain functional connectivity, but not neuroanatomy, captures the interrelationship between sex and gender in preadolescents

Reproducible Sex Differences in Personalized Functional Network Topography in Youth

Group-specific discriminant analysis reveals statistically validated sex differences in lateralization of brain functional network

Analysis of Gender Differences in the Brain Based on Deep Learning

Sex differences in normal age trajectories of functional brain networks

Common and unique brain aging patterns between females and males quantified by large‐scale deep learning

Sex Differences in the Adult Human Brain: Evidence from 5216 UK Biobank Participants

The sexual brain, genes, and cognition: A machine‐predicted brain sex score explains individual differences in cognitive intelligence and genetic influence in young children

Modeling brain sex in the limbic system as phenotype for female-prevalent mental disorders

Multimodal Image Analysis of Sexual Dimorphism in Developing Childhood Brain.

Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain

Predicting sex, age, general cognition and mental health with machine learning on brain structural connectomes

Studying the Effects of Sex-related Differences on Brain Age Prediction using brain MR Imaging

Data-driven brain network models predict individual variability in behavior

Sex Differences in Functional Brain Networks for Language