Abstract:Abstract A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Comparing a personalized and non‐personalized version of computerized practising, this study experimentally evaluates the relationships between student effort and ability across different dimensions of task perceptions. Students practise longer when the task is perceived to be not too difficult. Students assigned to a personalized version of the tool have a lower success rate while practising, but this does not translate to differences in practice intensity, task perceptions, or summative test scores. In a personalized practising environment, perceived interest and usefulness both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways. Students with a lower level of subject‐specific ability find the tool more interesting and, particularly, consider the non‐personalized tool difficult but useful. Instead, in the personalized condition, it is the group of students with higher prescores who value the tool as relatively useful. These results indicate that more students will remain engaged with adaptive practising if software takes into account such differences. Multiple approaches and algorithms may thus be necessary to optimally adapt practising to individual learners.Lay Description What is already known about this topic: A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Educators are generally optimistic that adaptive software in education has the potential to boost student learning outcomes. Obvious challenges remain in keeping school‐aged adolescents engaged throughout the learning process with digital learning tools used in low‐stakes settings. What this paper adds: Task perceptions regarding low‐stakes practising relate empirically to differential patterns of student engagement and performance for students of different ability. The impact of personalization on task perceptions evolves over time as students acquire more experience with the learning tool. Perceived interest and usefulness of working with digital learning tools both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways and only for students working in a personalized environment. High‐ability students assign higher usefulness to adaptive practising, which, relative to nonadaptive practising, is relatively difficult and lowers the success rate. Implications for practice and/or policy: When adaptive practising is implemented as a relatively low‐stakes activity, perceived usefulness is important in safeguarding student effort. More students will remain engaged with practising if adaptive software takes into account student differences (e.g., ability) and preferences (e.g., test preparation). Effective computerized personalized practising asks for a more comprehensive approach as to promote engagement of all students.

Practice Makes Perfect? Self-testing with External Rewards

Practice Makes Better: Quantifying Grade Benefits of Study

When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning?

Raising the bar: Testing prospective reciprocal relationships between multidimensional trait perfectionism and undergraduate academic achievement

How Should an Agent Practice?

Intrinsic motivation, external reward, and their effect on overall motivation and performance

The role of individual and social incentives on test-taking effort and performance

Close Games Versus Blowouts: Optimal Challenge Reinforces One's Intrinsic Motivation to Win.

Incentive Matters!—The Benefit of Reminding Students about Their Academic Standing in Introductory Economics Courses

Low-Stakes Quizzes Improve Learning and Reduce Overconfidence in College Students

Exam Credits and Exam Performance in University Economics Courses − Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Experiment

Student engagement with computerized practising: Ability, task value, and difficulty perceptions

Learning to Maximize (Expected) Utility

How small differences grow over time – the snowball effect of grit on practice in sport

The Enhancing Effect of Overconfidence on Subsequent Learning Performance: Potential Mediation Effects of Dissatisfaction and Effort

Does Difficulty even Matter? Investigating Difficulty Adjustment and Practice Behavior in an Open-Ended Learning Task

An experimental manipulation of the value of effort

How Learner Control and Explainable Learning Analytics on Skill Mastery Shape Student Desires to Finish and Avoid Loss in Tutored Practice

A Gamified Experiential Learning Intervention for Engaging Students Through Satisfying Needs

Science to practice: Does gamification enhance intrinsic motivation?

Studying the Effect of a Competitive Game Show in a Learning by Teaching Environment