Abstract:Background/Context Much has been written about the efficacy of formative assessment. However, relatively little of that research focuses on the design qualities of the assessment instruments themselves that might provide useful information to teachers. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study This article decomposes the formative assessment process and reviews the empirical literature on the feedback from an assessment event to the teacher to investigate two research questions. First, what are the design elements of assessments that can enhance their embedded information to help teachers understand how students are thinking about a particular content area? Second, what do teachers need to know to be able to take advantage of more sophisticated assessment designs? Research Design The article reviews the literature on test design qualities, focusing on empirical studies that have examined how the qualities of tests inform teachers about student understanding. Overall, 117 articles were synthesized to extract three qualities of test design that enable or constrain their potential to provide insight to teachers about student thinking. Findings/Results The literature review identified three crucial test qualities that improve their potential value to teachers. First, tests can convey information about students’ developmental path toward a learning goal. Second, tests can provide information about students’ thought processes. Third, tests can be designed to reveal information about students’ misconceptions within a content area. Conclusions/Recommendations The article concludes with a conceptual framework to guide future research on ways to maximize the potential feedback that teachers can receive from assessments. The framework, and hence suggestions for future research, focuses on conducting research on the hypothesized relationships between the qualities of a test itself, the analyses that teachers conduct from the resulting data of student answers, teachers’ instructional responses, and the effect of this process on student learning.

When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning?

Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing

The Testing Effect in University Teaching: Using Multiple-Choice Testing to Promote Retention of Highly Retrievable Information

Retrieval Practice in Classroom Settings: A Review of Applied Research

The optimal learning strategy depends on learning goals and processes: Retrieval practice versus worked examples.

Testing Enhances the Transfer of Learning

Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking

A grain of truth in the grain size effect: Retrieval practice is more effective when interspersed during learning.

Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review.

Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention

Getting at Student Understanding - the Key to Teachers’ Use of Test Data

Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis.

Emerging and Future Directions in Test-Enhanced Learning Research

Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues

Low-Stakes Quizzes Improve Learning and Reduce Overconfidence in College Students

Practice Makes Better: Quantifying Grade Benefits of Study

The Learning Power of Testing

The importance of quality and quantity: An investigation into the influence of accuracy and frequency of retrieval practice on learning

The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice

Learning from errors versus explicit instruction in preparation for a test that counts

A Toolbox of Strategies to Improve Test-Taking Skills: A Comparison of Student Perceptions