Abstract:Research has shown that testing is an effective strategy for improving memory for previously learned material compared to restudying (i.e., the testing effect or the retrieval practice effect). In this investigation, we examine whether providing less information about target items during a practice test (a lower constraint test) improves item and context memory over a practice test with more information about target items (a higher constraint test). Results showed that the lower constraint practice test led to better memory relative to the higher constraint test, restudy, and control conditions. Overall, we establish a way to increase the magnitude of the testing effect in memory, which may be a way to optimize memory using this well‐known study strategy. Introduction Retrieval practice has been shown to be an effective means of learning new information, a memory phenomenon known as the testing effect or the retrieval practice effect. Some work suggests that the magnitude of the testing effect can be enhanced when the test used for retrieval practice uses fewer cues to retrieve previously studied information. It is unclear, however, whether such testing benefits extend to peripheral contextual details associated with studied materials (e.g., location where stimuli appear, font color in which items are presented, etc.). In this experiment, we examine both item memory (i.e., memory for the studied items) and context memory under conditions where the intervening test offers fewer cues (i.e., lower constraint) compared to more cues (higher constraint) to better understand item and context memory testing effects. Methods Participants first studied word pairs presented in one of eight locations as well as in either red or green font color. Then, in the re‐exposure phase, participants processed materials in two types of intervening tests (lower constraint and a higher constraint test) as well as in a restudy condition, before a final memory test. Results For item memory, results showed that memory was better in the lower constraint testing condition compared to both the higher constraint testing condition as well as the restudy (control) condition. For context memory, results indicated improved memory for location context under lower constraint testing compared to both higher constraint testing and restudy conditions. There was no difference in memory, however, for color context across all conditions. Conclusion Overall, these findings suggest that providing fewer cues to aid retrieval in the intervening test can induce better memory for both items as well as some contextual details.

Individual differences diminish the pretest effect under productive memory conditions

Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention

Do working memory capacity and test anxiety modulate the beneficial effects of testing on new learning?

Cognitive Load Theory, Resource Depletion and the Delayed Testing Effect

Evaluating the Effect of Pretesting with Conversational AI on Retention of Needed Information

Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: Another test effect.

The role of mediators for the pretesting effect

Lower constraint testing enhances the testing effect for some contextual details but not others

Individual Differences in Learning Efficiency

The impact of working memory testing on long-term associative memory

An Investigation of Cross-Modality Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory

Long-Term Effects of Working Memory Retrieval From Prioritized and Deprioritized States

The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes

Testing Enhances the Transfer of Learning

Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: An fMRI study of the testing effect

Learning Efficiency: Identifying Individual Differences in Learning Rate and Retention in Healthy Adults

Working Memory Resources Depletion Makes Delayed Testing Beneficial

Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity

When Is Practice Testing Most Effective for Improving the Durability and Efficiency of Student Learning?

Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task