Abstract:Abstract A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Comparing a personalized and non‐personalized version of computerized practising, this study experimentally evaluates the relationships between student effort and ability across different dimensions of task perceptions. Students practise longer when the task is perceived to be not too difficult. Students assigned to a personalized version of the tool have a lower success rate while practising, but this does not translate to differences in practice intensity, task perceptions, or summative test scores. In a personalized practising environment, perceived interest and usefulness both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways. Students with a lower level of subject‐specific ability find the tool more interesting and, particularly, consider the non‐personalized tool difficult but useful. Instead, in the personalized condition, it is the group of students with higher prescores who value the tool as relatively useful. These results indicate that more students will remain engaged with adaptive practising if software takes into account such differences. Multiple approaches and algorithms may thus be necessary to optimally adapt practising to individual learners.Lay Description What is already known about this topic: A prerequisite for low‐stakes activities to improve learning is to keep students engaged when confronted with challenging material. Educators are generally optimistic that adaptive software in education has the potential to boost student learning outcomes. Obvious challenges remain in keeping school‐aged adolescents engaged throughout the learning process with digital learning tools used in low‐stakes settings. What this paper adds: Task perceptions regarding low‐stakes practising relate empirically to differential patterns of student engagement and performance for students of different ability. The impact of personalization on task perceptions evolves over time as students acquire more experience with the learning tool. Perceived interest and usefulness of working with digital learning tools both have the potential to promote engagement, albeit in different ways and only for students working in a personalized environment. High‐ability students assign higher usefulness to adaptive practising, which, relative to nonadaptive practising, is relatively difficult and lowers the success rate. Implications for practice and/or policy: When adaptive practising is implemented as a relatively low‐stakes activity, perceived usefulness is important in safeguarding student effort. More students will remain engaged with practising if adaptive software takes into account student differences (e.g., ability) and preferences (e.g., test preparation). Effective computerized personalized practising asks for a more comprehensive approach as to promote engagement of all students.

Does Difficulty even Matter? Investigating Difficulty Adjustment and Practice Behavior in an Open-Ended Learning Task

Student engagement with computerized practising: Ability, task value, and difficulty perceptions

Improving the Use of Retrieval Practice for Both Easy and Difficult Materials: The Effect of an Instructional Intervention

The Desirable Difficulty Framework as a Theoretical Foundation for Optimizing and Researching Second Language Practice

Testing Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking

Opportunities for Adaptive Experiments to Enable Continuous Improvement in Computer Science Education

Changes in Mental Workload and Motor Performance Throughout Multiple Practice Sessions Under Various Levels of Task Difficulty.

Does the Doer Effect Exist Beyond WEIRD Populations? Toward Analytics in Radio and Phone-Based Learning

Revelation of Task Difficulty in AI-aided Education

Interest-based text preference moderates the effect of text difficulty on engagement and learning

When is Learning "Effortful"? Scrutinizing the Concept of Mental Effort in Cognitively Oriented Research from a Motivational Perspective

Understanding searchers' perception of task difficulty: Relationships with task type

More Challenging or More Achievable? the Impacts of Difficulty and Dominant Goal Orientation in Leaderboards Within Educational Gamification

Human Decision Makings on Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Difficulty Adjustment

The Effects of Effort Feedback and L2 Task Attributions on Task Engagement and Performance

The Effects of Goal Type, Learning Interest, and Task Difficulty on Learning English Words

How Learner Control and Explainable Learning Analytics on Skill Mastery Shape Student Desires to Finish and Avoid Loss in Tutored Practice

Effects of task difficulty during practice on learning a dynamic balance task in healthy young adults: An intervention study

Towards understanding the effective design of automated formative feedback for programming assignments

Assessing Student's Dynamic Knowledge State by Exploring the Question Difficulty Effect

Effects of Automated Interventions in Programming Assignments: Evidence from a Field Experiment