Abstract:In this paper, we propose a new approach to the estimation of social networks and we apply it to the estimation of productivity spillovers in the U.S. Congress. Social networks such as the social connections among lawmakers are not generally directly observed, they can be recovered only using the observable outcomes that they contribute to determine (such as, for example, the legislators’ effectiveness). Moreover, they are typically stable for relatively short periods of time, thus generating only short panels of observations. Our estimator has three appealing properties that allows it to work in these environments. First, it is constructed for “small” asymptotic, thus requiring only short panels of observations. Second, it requires relatively nonrestrictive sparsity assumptions for identification, thus being applicable to dense networks with (potentially) star shaped connections. Third, it allows for heterogeneous common shocks across subnetworks. The application to the U.S. Congress gives us new insights about the nature of social interactions among lawmakers. We estimate a significant decrease over time in the importance of productivity spillovers among individual lawmakers, compensated by an increase in the party level common shock over time. This suggests that the rise of partisanship is not affecting only the ideological position of legislators when they vote, but more generally how lawmakers collaborate in the U.S. Congress.Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.

Using Committee Hearings to Place Lobbyists, Experts and Other Outside Agents into Legislative Preference Space

Simulating The U.S. Senate: An LLM-Driven Agent Approach to Modeling Legislative Behavior and Bipartisanship

Partisanship, expertise, or connections? A conjoint survey experiment on lobbyist hiring decisions

The Complexity of Probabilistic Lobbying

Feature Engineering for US State Legislative Hearings: Stance, Affiliation, Engagement and Absentees

Competitive lobbying in the influence production process and the use of spatial econometrics in lobbying research

Assessing differences in legislators' revealed preferences: A case study on the 107th U.S. Senate

The Role and Contribution of Academic Researchers in Congressional Hearings: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Influencing a Polarized and Connected Legislature

Relationship lobbying through repeated contributions: a humanomics approach

Political rhetoric through the lens of non‐parametric statistics: are our legislators that different?

Strategic communication in committees with expressive payoffs

Bringing Real Market Participants' Real Preferences into the Lab: An Experiment that Changed the Course Allocation Mechanism at Wharton

Costly Participation and Heterogeneous Preferences in Informational Committees

Agencies on the parliamentary radar: Exploring the relations between media attention and parliamentary attention for public agencies using machine learning methods

A Graphical Lasso Approach to Estimating Network Connections: the Case of U.S. Lawmakers

Studying Lobby Influence in the European Parliament

Deception in Reinforced Autonomous Agents

Influence in Weighted Committees

Bargaining on Behalf of a Constituency

Present-Biased Lobbyists in Linear Quadratic Stochastic Differential Games