Abstract:The polarization of political opinions among members of the U.S. legislative chambers measured by their voting records is greater today than it was thirty years ago. Previous research efforts to find causes of such increase have suggested diverse contributors, like growth of online media, echo chamber effects, media biases, or disinformation propagation. Yet, we lack theoretic tools to understand, quantify, and predict the emergence of high political polarization among voters and their legislators. Here, we analyze millions of roll-call votes cast in the U.S. Congress over the past six decades. Our analysis reveals the critical change of polarization patterns that started at the end of 1980's. In earlier decades, polarization within each Congress tended to decrease with time. In contrast, in the recent decades, the polarization has been likely to grow within each term. To shed light on the reasons for this change, we introduce here a formal model for competitive dynamics to quantify the evolution of polarization patterns in the legislative branch of the U.S. government. Our model represents dynamics of polarization, enabling us to successfully predict the direction of polarization changes in 28 out of 30 U.S. Congresses elected in the past six decades. From the evolution of polarization level as measured by the Rice index, our model extracts a hidden parameter - polarization utility which determines the convergence point of the polarization evolution. The increase in the polarization utility implied by the model strongly correlates with two current trends: growing polarization of voters and increasing influence of election campaign funders. Two largest peaks of the model's polarization utility correlate with significant political or legislative changes happening at the same time.

Political rhetoric through the lens of non‐parametric statistics: are our legislators that different?

"Read My Lips": Using Automatic Text Analysis to Classify Politicians by Party and Ideology

How Predictable is Your State? Leveraging Lexical and Contextual Information for Predicting Legislative Floor Action at the State Level

A Structural Text-Based Scaling Model for Analyzing Political Discourse

Assessing differences in legislators' revealed preferences: A case study on the 107th U.S. Senate

Bayesian spatial voting model to characterize the legislative behavior of the Colombian Senate 2010-2014

The evolution of polarization in the legislative branch of government

Computational analysis of US Congressional speeches reveals a shift from evidence to intuition

Cross-National Measurement of Polarization in Political Discourse: Analyzing floor debate in the U.S. and the Japanese legislatures

A Graphical Lasso Approach to Estimating Network Connections: the Case of U.S. Lawmakers

Feature Engineering for US State Legislative Hearings: Stance, Affiliation, Engagement and Absentees

Analyzing and visualizing polarization and balance with signed networks: the U.S. Congress case study

How Similar Are Elected Politicians and Their Constituents? Quantitative Evidence From Online Social Networks

Align Voting Behavior with Public Statements for Legislator Representation Learning.

Political Elites in the Attention Economy: Visibility Over Civility and Credibility?

Explaining Differences in Voting Patterns Across Voting Domains Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models

Donor activity is associated with US legislators' attention to political issues

The Role and Contribution of Academic Researchers in Congressional Hearings: A Critical Discourse Analysis

Predicting and understanding law-making with word vectors and an ensemble model

A network analysis of committees in the United States House of Representatives

Examining Political Rhetoric with Epistemic Stance Detection