A network analysis of committees in the United States House of Representatives

Mason A. Porter,Peter J. Mucha,M.E.J. Newman,Casey M. Warmbrand
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500191102
2005-05-17
Abstract:Network theory provides a powerful tool for the representation and analysis of complex systems of interacting agents. Here we investigate the United States House of Representatives network of committees and subcommittees, with committees connected according to ``interlocks'' or common membership. Analysis of this network reveals clearly the strong links between different committees, as well as the intrinsic hierarchical structure within the House as a whole. We show that network theory, combined with the analysis of roll call votes using singular value decomposition, successfully uncovers political and organizational correlations between committees in the House without the need to incorporate other political information.
Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems,Multiagent Systems,Statistics Theory,Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability,Physics and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to analyze the structural and organizational relationships between the committees and sub - committees in the United States House of Representatives. In particular, it reveals the close connections between different committees and their inherent hierarchical structures through network theory. Specifically, the authors hope to solve these problems through the following points: 1. **Reveal the connections between committees**: Using network theory, researchers construct a committee network connected by common members ("interlocks") to reveal the strong connections between different committees. 2. **Analyze the hierarchical structure**: Through network analysis, researchers hope to show the hierarchical structure within the entire House of Representatives, including the levels of sub - committees, committees, committee groups, and the entire House of Representatives. 3. **Evaluate the randomness of committee assignments**: Researchers hope to objectively analyze and determine whether the assignment of committee members is random or whether there is partisan bias (i.e., "stacked") in some important committees. 4. **Combine with vote - record analysis**: By analyzing the voting records of legislators through Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) technology, researchers hope to further reveal the association between the political stances of committee members and the committees. ### Specific problems - **Strength of connections between committees**: Quantify the number of common members between two committees by calculating the standardized "interlock" value and evaluate the strength of these connections. \[ \text{Standardized interlock}=\frac{\text{Actual number of common members}}{\text{Expected number of common members in random assignment}} \] - **Committee hierarchical structure**: Use the single - linkage clustering method to generate a dendrogram of committees, showing the cluster structures at different levels. - **Voting pattern analysis**: Analyze the voting matrix \(B\) through SVD, where \(B_{ij}\) represents the result of the \(i\)-th legislator's vote on the \(j\)-th vote (+1 for yes, - 1 for no, 0 for not voting). The SVD decomposition formula is as follows: \[ B_{ij}=\sum_{k = 1}^{n}\sigma_k u_i^{(k)}v_j^{(k)} \] where \(\sigma_k\) is the singular value, and \(u_i^{(k)}\) and \(v_j^{(k)}\) are the left and right singular vectors respectively. - **Political stance evaluation**: Define "partisan coordinates" and "bipartisan cooperation coordinates" through the first two leading eigenvectors to evaluate the political stances and voting behaviors of legislators. ### Conclusions Through network theory and SVD analysis, researchers have found that: - The connections between committees are not random, and there is indeed partisan bias in some committees. - The committee network has an obvious hierarchical structure. - Voting pattern analysis can effectively distinguish the political stances of legislators and reveal the political tendencies of committee members. These findings provide a new perspective for understanding the organizational structure and political operation of the United States House of Representatives.