Abstract:Media coverage plays an important role in shaping personal and public opinion, as it is often a primary source of information. Especially in today’s world where ideological division with subsequent polarization of the political discourse is constantly increasing across social networks, the responsibility of media professional to ensure an unbiased reporting is growing. However, the coverage often exhibits a speciﬁc political leaning that is reﬂected in the articles and is commonly referred to as media bias . Many works already exist in computational social science that explore this phenomenon using English-language newspaper articles. This thesis aims to investigate the phenomenon in the German media landscape. This work uses a new methodology to attribute newspaper articles to a political leaning based on the party afﬁliation of the politician who shared the article on social media. We used AbgeordnetenWatch — a platform containing short proﬁles of politicians — to generate a list of German MPs including their Twitter proﬁles. We extract their tweets, using the Twitter API, and select all tweets that reference an article in the German media landscape. We extract all articles, including the title, the summary, the actual text and several meta information. In the end, we obtain a dataset with a total of over 40 thousand articles from the most pop-ular German media houses and the respective politician who shared the article. We examine the resulting dataset with respect to three research questions: (1) How effective are standard classiﬁcation approaches with frequency-based features and the standard neural approach in detecting bias from the right-wing political fringe, when using the articles shared by all other parties as negative samples? (2) How effective are the same standard approaches in detecting bias from right-wing political fringe, when training against the articles shared by other parties separately? (3) How do the same approaches perform when applying to the detection of the left-wing party DIE LINKE , i.e.: a) when using the articles shared by all other parties as negative samples, analogous to (1); b) when training articles of DIE LINKE separately against articles of every other party, analogous to (2). The results of the experiments regarding the second and the third research questions are promising: the state-of-the-art model,

Agencies on the parliamentary radar: Exploring the relations between media attention and parliamentary attention for public agencies using machine learning methods

When the media matter for politics: Partisan moderators of the mass media’s agenda-setting influence on parliament in Belgium

Media Attention and Bureaucratic Responsiveness

Social Media and Political Agenda Setting

Media Attention and Deliberation on the Supreme Court

Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption

Incidental Exposure and News Engagement: Testing Temporal Order and the Role of Political Interest

All Things Considered: Detecting Partisan Events from News Media with Cross-Article Comparison

Identiﬁcation of Political Leaning in German News Articles

Analyzing Mass Media influence using natural language processing and time series analysis

Discovery of the Content and Engagement with the Content

More Voices Than Ever? Quantifying Media Bias in Networks

Quantifying time-dependent Media Agenda and Public Opinion by topic modeling

Exploring the Political Agenda of the European Parliament Using a Dynamic Topic Modeling Approach

Crossing the Aisle: Unveiling Partisan and Counter-Partisan Events in News Reporting

Media Bias and Polarization through the Lens of a Markov Switching Latent Space Network Model

Mapping the Media Landscape: Predicting Factual Reporting and Political Bias Through Web Interactions

Studying Lobby Influence in the European Parliament

Look Who's Talking: Bipartite Networks as Representations of a Topic Model of New Zealand Parliamentary Speeches

Uncovering Gender Bias in Media Coverage of Politicians with Machine Learning