Abstract:We analyze how institutions shape communication incentives in a Romer-Rosenthal agenda-setting model with private information and private values. An agenda-setter faces multiple voters who are privately informed about their ideal points in a one-dimensional policy space. We consider two institutions. In one setting, cheap-talk communication precedes a take-it-or-leave-it agenda-setting game. The second involves sequential agenda setting where the setter can revise the proposal only when the first one fails to gain enough support. The latter institution requires the setter to commit to a policy as a screening technology. The commitment fosters information disclosure from strategic voters and thus results in efficiency gains over straw polls, where the setter is not constrained in how she reacts to revealed information. In addition, we also find voters' sabotage incentive that may discount the informativeness of political communication. Specifically, when a voter preferring the status quo cannot directly block less preferred policies, he could have an incentive to induce an extreme reform proposal and expect it to fail. With numerical examples, we identify the sabotage phenomenon in nonmonotonic equilibrium, where the types of voters that sufficiently prefer and dislike the status quo send one signal, and the intermediate types send another one.

Bargaining on Behalf of a Constituency

Inefficient Markov Perfect Equilibria in Multilateral Bargaining

Communication in Collective Bargaining

Multilateral Bargaining with an Endogenously Determined Procedure

A Characterization of the E¢ Cient Outcome of Multilateral Bargaining by Markovian Strategies

Sequential Agenda Setting with Strategic and Informative Voting

Bargaining on price on behalf of price-insensitive downstream consumers

Pivot Versus Signaling in Collective Bargaining

Domestic constraints in crisis bargaining

Solutions for Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information: General Type Space and Action Space

Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information

Delay in Multilateral Bargaining under Complete Information

Bargaining Versus Posted-Price Selling

Application of Bargaining Schemes for Equilibrium Determination in Dynamic Games

Using Bargaining-Game Theory for Negotiating Concession Period for Bot-Type Contract

Delegation Structure and Incentives:The Case of Multiple Agents

Indirect Dynamic Negotiation in the Nash Demand Game

Searching and Bargaining with Middlemen

Reputational Bargaining with Ultimatum Opportunities

Costly Participation and Heterogeneous Preferences in Informational Committees

Orchestrating Organizational Politics: Baron and Ferejohn Meet Tullock *