Abstract:In this contribution we analyze the effect that mutual information has on the actual performance of efficient negotiation methods. Specifically, we start by proposing the theoretical notion of Abstract Negotiation Method (ANM) as a map from the negotiation domain in itself, for any utility profile of the parties. ANM can face both direct and iterative negotiations, since we show that ANM class is closed under the limit operation. The generality of ANM is proven by showing that it captures a large class of well known in literature negotiation methods. Hence we show that if mutual information is assumed then any Pareto efficient ANM is manipulable by one single party or by a collusion of few of them. We concern about the efficiency of the resulting manipulation. Thus we find necessarily and sufficient conditions those make manipulability equivalent to actual inefficiency, meaning that the manipulation implies a change of the efficient frontier so the Pareto efficient ANM converges to a different, hence actually inefficient, frontier. In particular we distinguish between strong and weak actual inefficiency. Where, the strong actual inefficiency is a drawback which is not possible to overcome of the ANMs, like the Pareto invariant one, so its negotiation result is invariant for any two profiles of utility sharing the same Pareto frontier, we present. While the weak actual inefficiency is a drawback of any mathematical theorization on rational agents which constrain in a particular way their space of utility functions. For the weak actual inefficiency we state a principle of Result's Inconsistency by showing that to falsify theoretical hypotheses is rational for any agent which is informed about the preference of the other, even if the theoretical assumptions, which constrain the space of agents' utilities, are exact in the reality, i.e. the preferences of each single agent are well modeled.

Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information

Bargaining Mechanisms for One-Way Games

Separating Equilibria in a Continuous-Time Bargaining Model with Two-Sided Uncertainty

Pivot Versus Signaling in Collective Bargaining

Optimal mechanism design with resale via bargaining

Inefficient Markov Perfect Equilibria in Multilateral Bargaining

Splitting The Difference In Incomplete‐Information Bargaining: Theory And Widespread Evidence From The Field

Domestic constraints in crisis bargaining

On the Actual Inefficiency of Efficient Negotiation Methods

Reputational Bargaining with Ultimatum Opportunities

Reputational Concern with Endogenous Information Acquisition

Compromise, Don't Optimize: Generalizing Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium to Allow for Ambiguity

Collective or individual rationality in the Nash bargaining solution: efficiency-free characterizations

Selling Information in Competitive Environments

Delay in Multilateral Bargaining under Complete Information

The Price of Fairness with the Extended Perles–Maschler Solution

Offsetting Uncertainty: Reassurance with Two‐Sided Incomplete Information

Mechanism Design with Set-Theoretic Beliefs

Bargaining on Behalf of a Constituency

Robust Persuasion of a Privately Informed Receiver

Existence of equilibria in persuasion games with costly information acquisition