Abstract:Personality and Social Psychology Review, Ahead of Print. Academic Understanding and reducing intergroup discrimination is at the forefront of psychological research. However, efforts to find flexible, scalable, and durable interventions to reduce discrimination have produced only mixed results. In this review, we highlight one potential avenue for developing new strategies for addressing discrimination: adapting prior research on debiasing—the process of lessening bias in judgment errors (e.g., motivated reasoning, overconfidence, and the anchoring heuristic). We first introduce a taxonomy for understanding intervention strategies that are common in the debiasing literature, then highlight existing approaches that have already proven successful for decreasing intergroup discrimination. Finally, we draw attention to promising debiasing interventions that have not yet been applied to the context of discrimination. A greater understanding of prior efforts to mitigate judgment biases more generally can expand efforts to reduce discrimination.Public Scientists studying intergroup biases are often concerned with lessening discrimination (unequal treatment of one social group versus another), but many interventions for reducing such biased behavior have weak or limited evidence. In this review article, we argue one productive avenue for reducing discrimination comes from adapting interventions in a separate field—judgment and decision-making—that has historically studied "debiasing": the ways people can lessen the unwanted influence of irrelevant information on decision-making. While debiasing research shares several commonalities with research on reducing intergroup discrimination, many debiasing interventions have relied on methods that differ from those deployed in the intergroup bias literature. We review several instances where debiasing principles have been successfully applied toward reducing intergroup biases in behavior and introduce other debiasing techniques that may be well-suited for future efforts in lessening discrimination.

The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?

In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.

Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison

Reflections on prejudice and intergroup relations

Effects of Intergroup Contact and Political Predispositions on Prejudice: Role of Intergroup Emotions

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Overconfidence and Prejudice

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Direct and Indirect Intergroup Friendship Effects: Testing the Moderating Role of the Affective-Cognitive Bases of Prejudice

Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice

Reducing prejudice in organizations: The role of intergroup contact, out-group homogeneity, and in-group size

Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM)

Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups

Intergroup Behavior in Organizations

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

Ethnocentrism, Social Identification, and Discrimination

The extended contact asymmetry: Authoritarians benefit more from positive but do not suffer more from negative extended intergroup contact

Outgroup Homogeneity Bias Causes Ingroup Favoritism

The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters

Generalized or Origin-Specific Out-Group Prejudice?: the Role of Temporary and Chronic Pathogen-Avoidance Motivation in Intergroup Relations.

How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?