Abstract:Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

Direct and Indirect Intergroup Friendship Effects: Testing the Moderating Role of the Affective-Cognitive Bases of Prejudice

Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

Effects of Intergroup Contact and Political Predispositions on Prejudice: Role of Intergroup Emotions

Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups

Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: A cross-national comparison

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Affective generalization from intergroup contact: Associations between contact-related and outgroup-related empathy, anxiety, and trust

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Contact with out-group friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes toward gay men.

When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance

The dynamics of interminority extended contact: The role of affective and cognitive mediators.

Toward whom does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Exploring national majorities’ prejudice toward ethnic and migrant minorities

Effects of Direct and Indirect Cross-Group Friendships on Judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Role of an Anxiety-Reduction Mechanism

Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship

Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact

The Extended Contact Hypothesis: A Meta-Analysis on 20 Years of Research

Indirect contact and prejudice reduction: limits and possibilities

Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety.

Effects of intergroup contact on explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes: A longitudinal field study with majority and minority group members