Abstract:Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Effects of intergroup contact on explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes: A longitudinal field study with majority and minority group members

Does Digital Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? A Meta-Analysis

Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

The dynamics of interminority extended contact: The role of affective and cognitive mediators.

When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance

Toward whom does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Exploring national majorities’ prejudice toward ethnic and migrant minorities

The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters

Indirect contact and prejudice reduction: limits and possibilities

Intergroup contact in context: The mediating role of social norms and group-based perceptions on the contact–prejudice link

The Longitudinal Relationship Between Youth Intergroup Contact and Social Cohesion Outcomes in Two Divided Societies

Effects of Intergroup Contact and Political Predispositions on Prejudice: Role of Intergroup Emotions

Reducing prejudice in organizations: The role of intergroup contact, out-group homogeneity, and in-group size

Does outgroup media exposure reduce prejudice in real life? Testing mediated contact effects with media diets in South Africa

When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations

Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups

Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact

Does intergroup contact affect personality? A longitudinal study on the bidirectional relationship between intergroup contact and personality traits