Abstract:The purpose of this study was to examine the potential interdependent relationships between religiosity, conservatism, social value orientation and philanthropy. Participants included members of four religious institutions. A non-experimental survey design was used gather information. Subjects were given a hypothetical task related to social value orientation, two scales of measurement related to religiosity and philanthropy and asked to self-identifr their political orientation. Chi Square analysis identified a significant relationship between political orientation and social value orientation. A correlation was found between religiosity and philanthropy within the liberal sample, rather than in the suspected conservative sample. Additionally, a one-way analysis of variance revealed that there were no significant differences in attitudes towards philanthropy. Results provide support for models suggesting that religion promotes competing psychological stances: conservatism and a prosocial value orientation. The Pew Research Center (2012) recently reported that America's politics fall along partisan lines and are more polarized than at any other time in the previous 25 years. This sentiment is often alluded to in today's media, and the 2012 Presidential election evidenced this as well. Each candidate emphasized that the 2012 election was about the fundamentally different paths on which America could be lead. A primary way that the policies of conservatives and liberals differ is the degree to which they facilitate government intervention in socioeconomic matters. Generally, the conservative base supports policies that stress minimal intervention. What is striking about this is that a core component of the conservative base is largely religious. While religious institutions typically promote prosocial attitudes and action, such as helping the poor, conservative economics reduce the amount of spending on social welfare programs. It seems that in regard to helping those of a lower socioeconomic class, political conservatism violates one of the primary tenets of most churches, yet many religious individuals continue to identify with conservative ideology (Guth, Kellstedt, Smidt, & Green, 2006; Kelly & Morgan, 2008; Layman & Carmines, 1997). This apparent contradiction was addressed extensively in a study conducted by Malka, Soto, Cohen, & Miller (2011). Their research was based on the hypothesis that religion has competing psychological influences on social welfare attitudes, and findings suggested that religiosity was a predictor for both opposition and approval of social welfare programs. It was argued that there are two pathways by which an individual can be influenced: one stressing conservatism, the other stressing prosocial values. Although specific determinants leading an individual to either pathway were not identified, the conservative pathway can be understood by recognizing that many politically conservative messages are those that are supported by the church. For instance, stances on sexuality, abortion and traditional families are topics that are central to each institution's identity. In relation to these stances, opposition to social welfare was hypothesized to be connected to one's need to be consistent in his or her world views. Malka et al. (2011) state that when a religious individual's views are aligned with the conservative end of politics, he may, in turn, "drag" his view of social welfare toward the conservative side so that his

Effects of Conservative Sociopolitical Attitudes on Public Support for Drug Rehabilitation Spending

Racial Prejudice and Spending on Drug Rehabilitation: The Role of Attitudes Toward Blacks and Latinos

A study of religiosity and conservatismin relation to social value orientation and philanthropy

Public preferences about government spending: Partisan, social, and attitudinal sources of policy differences

Decreased Bi-Partisan Support for Pretrial Detention in Less Serious Cases: Evidence From an Experimental Survey

Interested constituents: identifying groups to mobilize in community organizing efforts to strengthen alcohol control policies

Examining the Relationship between Culture and Perceived Societal Substance Use Stigma in a Michigan-Based Mental Health & Addiction Focused Community

The political divide: The case of expectations and preferences

Public support for harm reduction: A population survey of Canadian adults

The Effect of Social Environment on Treatment Outcomes in Outpatient Substance Misuse Treatment Organizations: Does Race Really Matter?

Public opinion on the expenditure of adult-use cannabis tax revenue: Evidence from New Jersey

Does Immigration Undermine Public Support for Social Policy?

The effect of Certificate‐of‐Need laws on substance use disorder care for vulnerable populations

Long-term efficacy of contingency management treatment based on objective indicators of abstinence from illicit substance use up to 1 year following treatment: A meta-analysis.

Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity

Racialized environments and syringe services program implementation: County-level factors

Beyond "pride or prejudice": Conservatism, opposition to political correctness, and support for Confederate and other controversial statues

Evidence-based sentencing: Public openness and opposition to using gender, age, and race as risk factors for recidivism.

Differences in stigma reduction related to injection drug use between people expressing conservative, moderate and progressive values following an online intervention

Community Support for Harm Reduction and Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

Religion, Psychedelics, Risky Behavior, and Violence