Abstract:This paper investigates the role of homophily and focus constraint in shaping collaborative scientific research. First, homophily structures collaboration when scientists adhere to a norm of exclusivity in selecting similar partners at a higher rate than dissimilar ones. Two dimensions on which similarity between scientists can be assessed are their research specialties and status positions. Second, focus constraint shapes collaboration when connections among scientists depend on opportunities for social contact. Constraint comes in two forms, depending on whether it originates in institutional or geographic space. Institutional constraint refers to the tendency of scientists to select collaborators within rather than across institutional boundaries. Geographic constraint is the principle that, when collaborations span different institutions, they are more likely to involve scientists that are geographically co-located than dispersed. To study homophily and focus constraint, the paper will argue in favour of an idea of collaboration that moves beyond formal co-authorship to include also other forms of informal intellectual exchange that do not translate into the publication of joint work. A community-detection algorithm is applied to the co-authorship network of the scientists that submitted in Business and Management in the 2001 UK RAE. While results only partially support research-based homophily, they indicate that scientists use status positions for discriminating between potential partners by selecting collaborators from institutions with a rating similar to their own. Strong support is provided in favour of institutional and geographic constraints. Scientists tend to forge intra-institutional collaborations; yet, when they seek collaborators outside their own institutions, they tend to select those who are in geographic proximity.

Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization

Collaboratories: doing science on the Internet

Update on National Science Foundation funding of the “Collaboratory”

LCHC: the evolution of a hybrid collaboratory

Is together better? Examining scientific collaborations across multiple authors, institutions, and departments

The Myth of Global Science Collaboration - Collaboration patterns in epistemic communities

Working in Collaboration-What, Why, and How?

Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams

Communities and Patterns of Scientific collaboration

On the Challenges of Collaborative Data Processing

Linking Labs: Interconnecting Experimental Environments

INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Collaboration and growth in a large research cooperative: A network analytic approach

An analysis of scientific group collaboration at JLESC

Toward scientific collaboration: A cost-benefit perspective

Collaboration in computer science: a network science approach. Part I

Life Sciences and the Web: A New Era for Collaboration

Facilitating Large-scale Collaboration Through Effective Mechanism Design: An Economic Examination of Resource Allocation in Collaboratories

Remote Collaboration Fuses Fewer Breakthrough Ideas

Communities in structural biology

Collaboration Online: The Example of Distributed Computing