Abstract:This paper investigates the role of homophily and focus constraint in shaping collaborative scientific research. First, homophily structures collaboration when scientists adhere to a norm of exclusivity in selecting similar partners at a higher rate than dissimilar ones. Two dimensions on which similarity between scientists can be assessed are their research specialties and status positions. Second, focus constraint shapes collaboration when connections among scientists depend on opportunities for social contact. Constraint comes in two forms, depending on whether it originates in institutional or geographic space. Institutional constraint refers to the tendency of scientists to select collaborators within rather than across institutional boundaries. Geographic constraint is the principle that, when collaborations span different institutions, they are more likely to involve scientists that are geographically co-located than dispersed. To study homophily and focus constraint, the paper will argue in favour of an idea of collaboration that moves beyond formal co-authorship to include also other forms of informal intellectual exchange that do not translate into the publication of joint work. A community-detection algorithm is applied to the co-authorship network of the scientists that submitted in Business and Management in the 2001 UK RAE. While results only partially support research-based homophily, they indicate that scientists use status positions for discriminating between potential partners by selecting collaborators from institutions with a rating similar to their own. Strong support is provided in favour of institutional and geographic constraints. Scientists tend to forge intra-institutional collaborations; yet, when they seek collaborators outside their own institutions, they tend to select those who are in geographic proximity.

Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams

How much do technical scientists really cooperate?

A "Distance Matters" Paradox: Facilitating Intra-Team Collaboration Can Harm Inter-Team Collaboration

How Data Scientists Work Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations: To Find The Right Answer Or To Ask The Right Question?

Collaboratories: doing science on the Internet

INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Communication in international collaborative research teams. A review of the state of the art and open research questions

Group decision making and communication technology

The Myth of Global Science Collaboration - Collaboration patterns in epistemic communities

How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Tools

Interdisciplinary collaboration from diverse science teams can produce significant outcomes

The chronic growing pains of communicating science online

Is together better? Examining scientific collaborations across multiple authors, institutions, and departments

Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization

Communities and Patterns of Scientific collaboration

Toward scientific collaboration: A cost-benefit perspective

Communities in structural biology

Team careers in science: formation, composition and success of persistent collaborations

The Secrets of Great Teamwork

An analysis of scientific group collaboration at JLESC

Collaboration Conundrum: Synchrony-Cooperation Trade-off