Abstract:Abstract Collaborations are essential in research, especially in answering increasingly complex questions that require integrating knowledge from different disciplines and that engage multiple stakeholders. Fostering such collaboration between newcomers and established researchers helps keep scientific communities alive while opening the way to innovation. But this is a challenge for scientific communities, especially as little is known about the onset of such collaborations. Prior social network research suggests that face-to-face interaction at scientific events as well as both network-driven selection patterns (reciprocity and transitivity) and patterns of active selection of specific others (homophily / heterophily) may be important. Learning science research implies, moreover, that selecting appropriate collaboration partners may require group awareness. In a field study at two scientific events on technology-enhanced learning (Alpine Rendez-Vous 2011 and 2013) including N = 5736 relations between 287 researchers, we investigated how researchers selected future collaboration partners, looking specifically at the role of career level, disciplinary background, and selection patterns. Face-to-face contact was measured using RFID devices. Additionally, a group awareness intervention was experimentally varied. Data was analyzed using RSiena and meta-analyses. The results showed that transitivity, reciprocity and contact duration are relevant for the identification of new potential collaboration partners. PhD students were less often chosen as new potential collaboration partners, and researchers with a background in Information Technology selected fewer new potential collaboration partners. However, group awareness support balanced this disciplinary difference. Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

An analysis of scientific group collaboration at JLESC

Global village or virtual balkans? evolution and performance of scientific collaboration in the information age

Is together better? Examining scientific collaborations across multiple authors, institutions, and departments

Collaboration across Time and Space in the LTER Network

INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Toward scientific collaboration: A cost-benefit perspective

Scientific Collaboration Network Based on MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry

Initiating scientific collaborations across career levels and disciplines – a network analysis on behavioral data

Collaborative Characteristics and Networks of National, Institutional and Individual Contributors Using Highly Cited Articles in Environmental Engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded

Macro-level Collaboration Network Analysis and Visualization with Essential Science Indicators: A Case of Social Science

Team careers in science: formation, composition and success of persistent collaborations

Collaboration in sensor network research: an in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns

Methods for assessing higher education research team collaboration: comparing research outputs and participant perceptions across four collaborative research teams

Collaboratories: doing science on the Internet

Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams

Measuring the Social Influences of Scientist Groups Based on Multiple Types of Collaboration Relations.

Collaboration in an Open Data eScience: A Case Study of Sloan Digital Sky Survey

International collaboration in LIS: global trends and networks at the country and institution level

Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization

Impact of Scientific, Economic, Geopolitical, and Cultural Factors on International Research Collaboration

Assessing Effectiveness of Supply Chain Collaboration: An Empirical Study