Abstract:China is experiencing rapid progress in industrialization, with its own rationale toward industrial land development based on a deliberate change from an extensive to intensive form of urban land use. One result has been concerted attempts by local government to attract foreign investment by a low industrial land price strategy, which has resulted in a disproportionally large amount of industrial land within the total urban land use structure at the expense of the urban sprawl of many cities. This paper first examines "Comparable Benchmark Price as Residential land use" (CBPR) as the theoretical basis of the low industrial land price phenomenon. Empirical findings are presented from a case study based on data from Jinyun County, China. These data are analyzed to reveal the rationale of industrial land price from 2000 to 2010 concerning the CBPR model. We then explore the causes of low industrial land prices in the form of a "Centipede Game Model", involving two neighborhood regions as "major players" to make a set of moves (or strategies). When one of the players unilaterally reduces the land price to attract investment with the aim to maximize profits arising from the revenues generated from foreign investment and land premiums, a two-player price war begins in the form of a dynamic game, the effect of which is to produce a downward spiral of prices. In this context, the paradox of maximizing profits for each of the two players are not accomplished due to the inter-regional competition of attracted investment leading to a lose-lose situation for both sides' in competing for land premium revenues. A short-term solution to the problem is offered involving the establishment of inter-regional cooperative partnerships. For the longer term, however, a comprehensive reform of the local financial system, more adroit regional planning and an improved means of evaluating government performance is needed to ensure the government's role in securing pubic goods is not abandoned in favor of one solely concerned with revenue generation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cost and Price Effects of Concentration Restrictions in the Plant Location Problem

Location Choices of Multi-plant Oligopolists: Theory and Evidence from the Cement Industry

Interstate Competition in Agriculture: Cheer or Fear? Evidence from the United States and China

More competitive than you think? Pricing and location of processing firms in agricultural markets

Price competition and market concentration: Evidence from the land market in China

Effect of Spatial Concentration of Manufacturing in China:A Review

Spatial Pricing Patterns in the United States

The Agglomeration-Differentiation Tradeoff in Spatial Location Choice

Quality, Location and Collusion under Spatial Price Discrimination

Industrial Land Price and Its Impact on Urban Growth : a Chinese Case Study

How Costly Are Restrictions on Size?

Spatial Competition and Lowest Price Commitment

Location and Price Competition on a Uniform Path with Different Pricing Policies

Concentration-Based Inference for Evaluating Horizontal Mergers

Spatial Competition and Social Welfare Considering Different Feasible Location Regions

Effects of Manure Use and Use Restrictions on Variable Production Costs and Net Incomes for United States Corn Producers

Urban/rural spatial price discrimination with online competition

Input Price Discrimination by Resale Market

Spatial Procurement of Farm Products and the Supply of Processed Foods: Application to the Tomato Processing Industry

Prices and Concentration: A U-shape? Theory and Evidence from Renewables

Cost heterogeneity, industry concentration and strategic trade policies