How Can the Rise in Land Prices Improve the Efficiency of Urban Land Use?
CHEN Zhuo,XU Caicai,ZHANG Yaoyu,LI Qiuming,Long Kaisheng,CHEN Ligen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20220606
2022-01-01
Abstract:In the context of the intensification of urban land resource scarcity, this study attempted to explore the formation paths and direction of forcing the improvement of urban land use efficiency by means of price. Using the panel data of 280 prefecture-level cities from 2007 to 2019 and using the dynamic spatial Durbin model, this article systematically described the short-term and long-term ef?fects of land price rises on the improvement of urban land use efficiency from the overall level and the level of sub-use scale, and inves?tigated the strategic interaction of local governments in cities of the same scale in the face of price changes. The results showed that, at the overall level, the rise in urban land prices improved the urban land use efficiency in the experimental area but inhibited the efficien?cy of surrounding areas. At the level of sub-use scale, the results showed that:① The rise in the price of commercial and residential land promoted the improvement of efficiency in the short term, and the impact was gradually weakened in the long term. In addition, in the short term, the 'siphon effect' was mainly reflected in the strategic interaction between governments. In the long run, the 'demon?stration effect' was mainly reflected among large cities of the same size, while the 'siphon effect' was mainly reflected among small and medium-sized cities.②Industrial land prices did not significantly improve efficiency in the short term, but played a more obvious role in the long term. In the short term, the ‘siphon effect' was mainly reflected in the strategic interaction between governments. In the long run, the 'demonstration effect' was mainly reflected among large cities of the same size, while the 'siphon effect' was reflected among small and medium-sized cities. Therefore, for commercial and residential land, we should continue to deepen the 'bidding, auction, and listing ' transfer system and the reform of the fiscal and tax systems to avoid the phenomenon of offering only to 'those with the highest price ' . For industrial land, combining an effective marketization mechanism with efficient government management and setting up a re?fined, multi-level collaborative management system throughout the different stages is conducive to the improvement of the efficiency of land use over the long term.