Analysis of Ground Settlement Caused by Double-line TBM Tunnelling Under Existing Building

Dongxue Hao,Renjun Zhu,Ke Wu,Rong Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01934-5

2021-07-10

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

Abstract:TBM tunnelling is less used in the subway construction in prosperous city due to the limitation of the engineering geological conditions. The studies on the influence of the TBM construction on the existing buildings are also limited. Therefore, based on the engineering case of tunnel crossing existing building in the section of Haiboqiao ~ Xiaocunzhuang station of Qingdao Metro Line 1, the numerical model that simulates the construction process of TBM tunnelling in slightly weathered granite layer is established by three-dimensional finite difference software FLAC3D to analyze the influence of TBM tunnelling. The comparisons between ground deformations obtained by FLAC3D and field monitoring data in different construction stages of double-line tunnel have been made firstly to validate the numerical model. Then the ground settlement characteristics, differential settlement and the stress distribution of the existing building and the stress of segment structure have been analyzed. During TBM tunnelling under existing building, the settlement of the building as a whole tends to increase, with the maximum measured settlement of 5.45 mm and the maximum differential settlement of 1.58 mm, which meets the control standard of relevant codes. Ground settlement groove along the transverse and vertical sections occurs near the building and tunnels, and the settlement becomes smaller with the farther the distance from the building and tunnels. The settlement curve on the cross section changes dynamically and is approximately V-shaped, and its width is about 5 ~ 6 times diameter of the tunnel. For the same cross section, the range of the settlement groove after tunnelling right line increases obviously compared with that after tunnelling left line (first construction), the settlement values also increase, and the symmetrical axis of the settlement curve is shifted to the right. For the segment structure, the maximum principal tensile stress occurs inside the arch bottom of the tunnel, while the maximum principal compressive stress occurs near the arch top and arch waist, with obvious stress concentration. For the existing building, the maximum principle tensile stress occurs at the door opening of the wall on the first floor and the maximum principal compressive stress is at the corner of wall. They are less than the tensile strength and compressive strength of the segment structure and building respectively, and have enough safety margins. This paper can provide important practical reference for the deformation control and protection design of surrounding buildings for relative construction.