Abstract:What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict. What was the relationship between international law and colonial warfare in the period of both increasingly formal imperialism and international law's professionalisation and codification in the nineteenth-century's second half? Existing work may lead to assumptions that international law would not be seen to apply to colonial wars, or served to justify them alone. This article turns away from previous focuses on the intellectual history of international law, prescriptive sources such as military manuals, and approaches extending from criminal law and colonial policing to demonstrate how and why imperial officials, politicians, and activists believed international law applied to colonial wars. Examining the British Empire, it shows how arguments about the use of international law in this period initially varied in the service of imperial interests, how and why public activism increasingly encouraged a more consistent approach – and discusses implications for the history and present of the law of armed conflict.

Children of the Empire. The shaping of English identity, 1890-1914

Increasing inclusion for ethnic minority students by teaching the British Empire and global history in the English history curriculum

“For Home, Country and Race”: The Gendered Ideals of Citizenship in English Elementary and Evening Continuation Schools, 1885-1914

Curriculum history, ‘English’ and the New Education; or, installing the empire of English?

The English School and the concept of ‘empire’: theoretical and practical/political implications

‘A Good West Indian, a Good African, and, in Short, a Good Britisher’:1 Black and British in a Colour-Conscious Empire, 1760–1950

Edinburgh and empire. Geographical science and citizenship for a ‘new’ age, ca.1900

Collaboration and Knowledge Exchange between Scholars in Britain and the Empire, 1830–1914

The Concept of Empire in Western Europe from the Fifth to the Fourteenth Century.

Between Empires: Rethinking Identity and Citizenship in the Context of Globalization

Coudenhove - Kalergi's View on England in His Pan - European Idea

The Rise and Dissolution of the British Empire’s Discourse Hegemony

West German historiography of the German Empire as an example of the implementation of historical policy

Bildung or development? Rereading George Lamming and W. Arthur Lewis

Visions of deliverance: Social scientization, functionalism, and the expansive purposiveness of state schooling in nineteenth-century British parliamentary politics

The Genealogy of ‘Cultural Literacy’

Age, Status, and Reading in the Eighteenth Century

Patriotism and Empire

Temperance and Self-Determination in the British Isles

Civilising Violence: International Law and Colonial War in the British Empire, 1850–1900

Linguistic Imperialism