Administrative theory and large organizations of the future: whither bureaucracy?

James A. Gazell,Darrell L. Pugh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699008524696

1990-01-01

International Journal of Public Administration

Abstract:The literature of administrative theory is rife with speculation about the future of large organizations (particularly bureaucracies), mostly in the United States but abroad as well. Some writers predicted the end of bureaucracies allegedly because such organizations are unable to adapt to rapidly changing environments. They forecast that bureaucracies would be supplanted gradually but inexorably by a spate of alternatives, none of which would become dominant to the point of assuming the exalted status of a new paradigm. They answered the question--whither bureaucracy?--in the negative. The central theme of this article is that such forecasts are turning out to be wide of the mark. The authors posit that suggested alternatives to bureaucracies are really just modifications to enhance their adaptability to their dynamic environments. Furthermore, the writers contend that during the last decade there was substantial growth of bureaucracies, corporate and governmental, and that this expansion will likely continue for the rest of the century, although there may be variations in the forms of bureaucracy. To explore this theme, the authors divided this article into three sections: (1) an exploration of some leading end-of-bureaucracy forecasts prevalent since the 1960s, (2) notable developments during the last decade, and (3) the organizational-design modifications likely to predominate for the rest of the century. This examination led to the conclusion that the chief issue is not whether bureaucracy will continue, but what alterations will be made to it. In one form or another bureaucracy figures to remain as the preeminent structural design for organizations.