Large N, Supersymmetry ... and QCD

G. Veneziano,J. Wosiek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0603045
2006-11-19
Abstract:This paper consists of two (still only vaguely) related parts: in the first, we briefly review work done in the past three years on the ``planar equivalence" between a class of non-supersymmetric theories (including limiting cases of QCD) and their corresponding supersymmetric "parents"; in the second, we present details of a new formulation of planar quantum mechanics and illustrate its effectiveness in an intriguing supersymmetric example.
High Energy Physics - Theory
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve The paper "Towards Self-organizing Bureaucracies" attempts to address the issues of inefficiency and poor adaptability in bureaucratic institutions. Specifically, the authors propose self-organization as a method to improve the efficiency and adaptability of bureaucracies and other similar social systems. ### Main Problem Background 1. **Inefficiency of Bureaucracies**: - Bureaucracies often suffer from corruption, rigidity, and delays, which severely impact their efficiency. - Real-world bureaucracies are far from the ideal state of maximum efficiency. 2. **Need for Adaptability**: - The world is changing rapidly, and static problem domains are no longer applicable. Traditional optimization methods are limited in dynamic environments. - The behavior of institutions themselves can change the optimal solution, necessitating the design of bureaucracies that can adapt to changing circumstances. 3. **Limitations of Existing Solutions**: - Although cybernetics and systems theory proposed some solutions decades ago, these methods are not widely applied in practice. - Traditional problem-solving methods are often suited to static domains and struggle to cope with dynamic environments. ### Solutions 1. **Principles of Self-organization**: - Increase local and global "satisfaction" by reducing local "friction." Here, "friction" refers to interference or conflict between agents. - Improve communication, perceive public satisfaction, dynamically modify hierarchical structures, and implement top-down and bottom-up processes to reduce friction between agents, thereby enhancing the efficiency of bureaucracies. 2. **Random Agent Networks (RANs)**: - Introduce a new computational model—Random Agent Networks (RANs)—to demonstrate the advantages of self-organizing bureaucracies. - Through computational experiments, the RANs model shows how self-organization can improve the performance of abstract bureaucracies. ### Specific Aspects 1. **Communication**: - Propose the different characteristics of synchronous and asynchronous communication and how to reduce communication delays through technological means. - By analyzing the time taken to send and reply to messages, bottlenecks can be detected and resources can be reallocated in real-time. 2. **Sensors**: - Develop sophisticated sensors to perceive and digest information related to the goals of the bureaucracy. - By measuring public attention delays and interaction frequencies, reduce friction between the bureaucracy and the public. 3. **Hierarchical Structure**: - While hierarchical structures are useful, excessive rigidity can affect adaptability. - Dynamically adjust hierarchical structures through multi-scale analysis and modular approaches to cope with environmental complexity. 4. **Top-down and Bottom-up Processes**: - Provide personalized solutions for specific situations through top-down and bottom-up processes, reducing internal and external friction. - Use automatic classification or clustering techniques to categorize contexts into common categories, allowing the system to automatically recognize and take appropriate actions. ### Summary The core of this paper is to improve the efficiency and adaptability of bureaucracies through the principles of self-organization. This goal is achieved by reducing local friction, improving communication, perceiving public satisfaction, dynamically adjusting hierarchical structures, and implementing top-down and bottom-up processes. The Random Agent Networks (RANs) model further validates the effectiveness of these methods.