Abstract:We are now rethinking the idea of electronic democracy. Today nobody is looking at e-democracy from the perspective of a living room, push button, instant referenda democracy. In the electronic age it is more and more evident that we are facing a complex evolution of the functioning of political systems — that democracy is becoming not direct, but continuous; that we can look at an extreme democracy. At the same time, we are making a distinction between e-government and e-democracy. Talking about e-government we are looking mainly at the efficiency of the administration. Talking about e-democracy we are looking mainly at the citizens’ participation in the political and democratic process. But in the search for efficiency citizens should not be equated merely to consumers. The Internet, or the cyberspace, must remain available to allow free development of personality, the exercise of freedom of speech and associations carrying out civic initiatives, experimenting with all new forms of democracy. Furthermore we can easily see that we are promised a future full of administrative efficiency and consequently more rich in democracy. But at the same time we are too often obscuring a present where growing forms of control and social selection are dramatically limiting individual and collective rights – and mainly through electronic technologies. We cannot accept a kind of institutional schizophrenia. We cannot build up two non-communicating worlds giving people the illusion they are living in a place where they are experiencing technologies of freedom when they are more and more victims of technologies of control. If we look at the information and communication technologies in the framework of the democratic state, we cannot accept the silent transformation of our society in surveillance societies. We have to look to democracy as a process and to the Internet as the new crucial public sphere, a commons for interaction, for the production of public discourse, for the creation of an “espace citoyen”, a place for citizenship. We must avoid the transformation of the global agora to a global panopticon, and make available for all citizens a “social software” that can give them the opportunity to be actors of a knowledge control-participation-deliberation democratic process, and not voices to be heard only at the end of this process, transforming democracy into electronic populism.

Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Speculations

Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy?

Citizen and Open Government: An Empirical Analysis of Antecedents of Open Government Data

Digital Governance: An Assessment of Performance and Best Practices

Digital Governance: New Technologies for Improving Public Service and Participation

Democracy, innovation, and the information society

The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web

Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity

ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE IN THE PROCESS OF MAKING MANAGEMENT DECISIONS

Democracy, essential element of the electronic government

When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration

Foundations of e-Democracy

Evaluating the Readiness of Government Portal Websites in China to Adopt Contemporary Public Administration Principles

Citizen–Government Interaction and the Internet: Expectations and Accomplishments in Contact, Quality, and Trust

A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory

Does the internet create democracy?

On Electronic Government & Internal Administration in Institutions of Higher Learning

Online Resolution and Citizen Empowerment

Digital Limits of Government: The Failure of E-Democracy

The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample

The Internet: New principles of political right, new social contract