Abstract:Purpose This paper seeks to explore one particular aspect of recent PA research: the apparently widening gap between top academic research and practitioner concerns. This topic was commissioned by the Editor of IJPSM . Evidence of this sliding away from the “real world” is presented. The reasons for it are discussed including Q1 increased measurement, competition and professionalization within academia. Whilst these trends bring significant benefits, a case can nevertheless be made for re-balancing PA research. The purpose of this paper Q2 is to sketch some ways of approaching these trends. Design/methodology/approach This paper was commissioned by the editor. The author has chosen to examine the often-cited gap between academic research and current practitioner concerns. The author has done this using as the author’s main evidence base all the main articles published by the highest impact journals over the years 2015 and 2016. Findings Over the past 30 years more and more of the PA research published in the highest impact journals has become further and further removed from the immediate concerns of practicing administrators and managers. At the same time publication in these journals has become more salient for academic careers. Research limitations/implications Whilst the identified trends bring significant benefits (in terms of increasing professionalization and methodological sophistication) they also carry negative consequences for the historically important dialogue between academics and practitioners. A case can be made for attempting to re-balance PA research. Some ways of approaching this are sketched. Practical implications The academic practitioner dialogue, which, historically, has been vital for academic PA, is currently under some stress. Professionalization and competition within the academic world seem to have widened the gap between the top journals and the “real world.” A case is made that the PA academic community needs to find ways of giving this issue more systematic discussion. Originality/value If the argument is largely correct, then current trends threaten the future of academic PA research. This paper is not the first to identify this threat, but it is one of the first to give it extended consideration and systematically to consider possible causes and remedies.

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

The Scope and Trends of Public Administration Publications from Selected Journals Between the Year 2000 and 2019

Behavioral Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Public Administration: an Agenda for Future Research

A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test

Public Administration for Development: Trends and the Way Forward

Meet the New Es: Empathy, Engagement, Equity, and Ethics in Public Administration

Handbook of Public Administration

A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration

Public administration research since 1980: slipping away from the real world?

It's about time! Temporal dynamics and longitudinal research designs in public administration

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries

Comparative Studies in Public Administration: Intellectual Challenges and Alternative Perspectives

The Behavioral Public Administration Movement: A Critical Reflection

The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate

Public Administration at the Millennium: The State of the Field

Research on Organizational Reputation in the Public Sector:International Frontiers and Reflections

Methodologies Toward a New Era of Public Administration: Diversity and Advancement

The Research Method of Public Administration:Question and Reflection

Research on Paradigm of Chinese Public Administration:A Historical Review and Assesment

Organizational Socialization in Public Administration Research: A Systematic Review and Directions for Future Research