Abstract:Abstract The purpose of this introduction and Special Issue (SI) is to offer a unique and timely opportunity to explore, revisit and critically examine key methodological debates and tensions with the purpose of advancing diversity and novel theorizing in the field. We join voices with the authors of the five papers of this SI to problematize taken‐for‐granted assumptions and research traditions and pave the way for inclusive and novel theorizing in management scholarship. We revisit four long‐lasting debates that hinder methodological pluralism and diversity in management scholarship: (a) the quantitative‐qualitative research divide, (b) the legitimacy of mixed‐methods research, (c) the rigour versus relevance tension and (d) the lack of methodological innovation. We suggest that these debates are at least partly counterproductive because they create silos and opposing camps, thereby inhibiting an appreciation of different worldviews and collective learning. The dominance of functionalism and positivism in quantitative research and the inappropriate transfer of quantitative logics in qualitative research have led to a lack of diversity in empirical methodologies. The field's limited methodological diversity is further proliferated by a strict adherence to quality standards that have inadvertently promoted homogeneity. This introduction highlights the challenges and potential of mixed methods, which are gaining momentum owing to calls for methodological pluralism. We also call for a re‐evaluation of quality standards to encourage more innovative and diverse research methodologies.

Methodologies Toward a New Era of Public Administration: Diversity and Advancement

A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration

The future of public administration research: An editor's perspective

The Fruits of Diversity and Globalization: Participation and Contributions of East-Asian Scholars in Public Administration

Promoting State-of-the-Art Methods in Public Management Research

Meet the New Es: Empathy, Engagement, Equity, and Ethics in Public Administration

Advancing Research Methodologies in Management: Revisiting Debates, Setting New Grounds for Pluralism

On the “Chineseness” and “Publicness” of Chinese Public Administration

Introduction: the Need for Methodological Rigor and Diversity in Administrative Ethics

Administrative Discretion in A Turbulent Time: an Introduction

The Case for Public Administration with a Global Perspective

Comparative Studies in Public Administration: Intellectual Challenges and Alternative Perspectives

Social Equity in Public Administration: A Call to Action

Research Methodology Evolution of Public Administration in China

Public Administration As a Dynamic Balance and Integrative Science Across Politics, Management, and Law: Rosenbloom’s Framework and Chinese Experiences

An agenda for the study of Public Administration in Developing Countries

A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test

Public Administration for Development: Trends and the Way Forward

Comparative Public Administration in a Globalized World: Moving Beyond Standard Assumptions Toward Increased Understanding

On the Publicness of Public Administration and Why It is Possible

Research on Paradigm of Chinese Public Administration:A Historical Review and Assesment