Abstract:Structural Health Monitoring, Ahead of Print. In the near future, Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) technologies will be capable of overcoming the drawbacks in the current maintenance and life-cycle management paradigms, namely, cost, increased downtime, less-than-optimal safety management paradigm and the limited applicability of fully-autonomous operations. One of the most challenging tasks is structural damage quantification. Existing quantification techniques face accuracy and/or robustness issues when it comes to varying operating and environmental conditions. In addition, the damage/no-damage paradigm of current industrial frameworks does not offer much information to maintainers on the ground for proper decision-making. In this study, a novel structural damage quantification framework is proposed based on the widely-used Damage Indices (DIs) and Gaussian Process Regression Models (GPRMs) in order to overcome the aforementioned shortcomings. The proposed framework takes a simple approach to the damage quantification problem by using DI values for training, and provides confidence bounds on the estimated states. In addition, the proposed method is shown to quantify multiple structural states simultaneously from incoming DI test points. This framework is applied to three test cases: a Carbon Fibre-Reinforced Plastic (CFRP) coupon with attached weights as simulated damage, an aluminum coupon with a notch and an aluminum coupon with attached weights as simulated damage under varying loading states. The novel state prediction method presented herein is applied to single-state quantification in the first two test cases, as well as the third one assuming the loading state is known. Finally, the proposed method is applied to the third test case assuming neither the damage size nor the load is known in order to predict both simultaneously from incoming DI test points. In applying this framework, two forms of GPRMs (standard and variational heteroscedastic) are used in order to critically assess their performance with respect to the three test cases.

Inverse gaussian accelerated test models based on cumulative damage

Accelerated test models with the inverse Gaussian distribution

Applicability Evaluation of Damage Evolution Models in Simulating Repeated Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Composite Laminates

Optimal step stress accelerated degradation tests with the bivariate inverse Gaussian process

A doubly accelerated degradation model based on the inverse Gaussian process and its objective Bayesian analysis

Accelerated degradation data analysis based on inverse Gaussian process with unit heterogeneity

Reliability Assessment and Remaining Useful Life Prediction Based on the Inverse Gaussian Step-Stress Accelerated Degradation Data

Optimal Stress Levels in Accelerated Degradation Testing for Various Degradation Models

Objective Bayesian analysis for the accelerated degradation model based on the inverse Gaussian process

Optimal step-stress accelerated degradation test plans for inverse Gaussian process based on proportional degradation rate model

Accelerated Degradation Test Planning Using the Inverse Gaussian Process

Gaussian process regression for active sensing probabilistic structural health monitoring: experimental assessment across multiple damage and loading scenarios

New Data Augmentation-Driven RUL Prognosis Approach for Cumulative Damage Model Using Incomplete Observations.

Advances in Accelerated Life Tests With Step and Varying Stress

Inverse Gaussian process models for degradation analysis: A Bayesian perspective

Inverse Gaussian process model with frailty term in reliability analysis

The duration of load effect in lumber as stochastic degradation

Degradation analysis based on an extended inverse Gaussian process model with skew-normal random effects and measurement errors

Bayesian Degradation Analysis With Inverse Gaussian Process Models Under Time-Varying Degradation Rates

Optimal Accelerated Degradation Testing Based on Bivariate Gamma Process with Dependent Components