Abstract:Case studies have long been used to research and illuminate the lives of gifted students. One example is the longitudinal study of profoundly gifted students by the first author elaborating the impact of acceleration, non-acceleration, and ability grouping on gifted students academically, socially, and emotionally. In this chapter an overview of ability grouping and acceleration for academically gifted high school students in Australia in relation to their self-esteem will be reiterated. Specifically, a study will be discussed that examined the effects of three interventions: (1) ability grouping, (2) acceleration, and (3) acceleration used concurrently with ability grouping, on the self-esteem of academically gifted high school students. Self-esteem was assessed on three occasions during the school year with three groups of academically gifted Australian students undertaking their first year of secondary school (Year 7): (a) students in comprehensive schools (mixed-ability settings); (b) students in selective high schools (full-time ability grouping in schools serving only gifted students); and (c) students in selective high schools who were also collapsing Years 7 and 8 into a single year—a blend of ability grouping and acceleration. Students in the first two groups experienced a diminution (but not a serious drop) in self-esteem, probably associated with the drop-in status from being the most senior students in a (relatively) small primary school to being one of the youngest students in a school that could be several times larger. By contrast, students in the third group, which was not only experiencing the shift from primary to secondary school status but also telescoping the first two high school years into one, experienced only a modest dip in self-esteem. Their scores started off high and remained high. Some teachers in the schools employing the blend of acceleration and grouping expressed their concern that the use of two treatments rather than one might be ‘a bridge too far’. It does not seem to have been. Rather it seems to be an effective mode of blending two interventions whose effectiveness for supporting gifted students’ self-esteem is already acknowledged. Implications for research and practice that links with current research will be elaborated.

Practitioner Objections to the Academic Acceleration of Gifted Children

Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study.

Academic Acceleration: Is it Right for My Child?

Exceptionally Gifted Children: Long-Term Outcomes of Academic Acceleration and Nonacceleration

Applying Frasier Four A’s to Promote Upstander Teachers for Academic Acceleration of Gifted Black Students

Teacher Attitudes toward Academic Acceleration and Accelerated Students in the Netherlands

The Efficacy of Academic Acceleration for Gifted Minority Students

Put Them Together and See How They Learn! Ability Grouping and Acceleration Effects on the Self-Esteem of Academically Gifted High School Students

Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students.

A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the study of mathematically precocious youth

Nonintellectual correlates of satisfaction with acceleration: A longitudinal study

Describing the Status of Programs for the Gifted

Gifted Students with Attention Deficits: Fact and/or Fiction? Or, Can We See the Forest for the Trees?

Confronting the Gordian Knot: Disentangling Gifted Education's Major Issues

An Investigation of an Early College Entrance Program’s Ability to Impact Intellectual and Social Development

Assessment Practices and the Underrepresentation of Minority Students in Gifted and Talented Education

Barriers to Underserved Students’ Participation in Gifted Programs and Possible Solutions

Potential parental determinants of the pace of evidence-based practice change in children's mental health care.

A Complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students

National Survey of Identification Practices in Gifted and Talented Education