Abstract:Case studies have long been used to research and illuminate the lives of gifted students. One example is the longitudinal study of profoundly gifted students by the first author elaborating the impact of acceleration, non-acceleration, and ability grouping on gifted students academically, socially, and emotionally. In this chapter an overview of ability grouping and acceleration for academically gifted high school students in Australia in relation to their self-esteem will be reiterated. Specifically, a study will be discussed that examined the effects of three interventions: (1) ability grouping, (2) acceleration, and (3) acceleration used concurrently with ability grouping, on the self-esteem of academically gifted high school students. Self-esteem was assessed on three occasions during the school year with three groups of academically gifted Australian students undertaking their first year of secondary school (Year 7): (a) students in comprehensive schools (mixed-ability settings); (b) students in selective high schools (full-time ability grouping in schools serving only gifted students); and (c) students in selective high schools who were also collapsing Years 7 and 8 into a single year—a blend of ability grouping and acceleration. Students in the first two groups experienced a diminution (but not a serious drop) in self-esteem, probably associated with the drop-in status from being the most senior students in a (relatively) small primary school to being one of the youngest students in a school that could be several times larger. By contrast, students in the third group, which was not only experiencing the shift from primary to secondary school status but also telescoping the first two high school years into one, experienced only a modest dip in self-esteem. Their scores started off high and remained high. Some teachers in the schools employing the blend of acceleration and grouping expressed their concern that the use of two treatments rather than one might be ‘a bridge too far’. It does not seem to have been. Rather it seems to be an effective mode of blending two interventions whose effectiveness for supporting gifted students’ self-esteem is already acknowledged. Implications for research and practice that links with current research will be elaborated.

Academic Acceleration: Is it Right for My Child?

Applying Frasier Four A’s to Promote Upstander Teachers for Academic Acceleration of Gifted Black Students

Exceptionally Gifted Children: Long-Term Outcomes of Academic Acceleration and Nonacceleration

The Efficacy of Academic Acceleration for Gifted Minority Students

Practitioner Objections to the Academic Acceleration of Gifted Children

Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study.

Put Them Together and See How They Learn! Ability Grouping and Acceleration Effects on the Self-Esteem of Academically Gifted High School Students

A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the study of mathematically precocious youth

Lessons from the Field: Examining the Challenges and Successes of a Mathematics and Science Program Using Acceleration and Enrichment for Gifted Urban Middle School Students

Early Math Coursework and College Readiness: Evidence from Targeted Middle School Math Acceleration

Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students.

Teacher Attitudes toward Academic Acceleration and Accelerated Students in the Netherlands

The Case for Early, Targeted Interventions to Prevent Academic Failure

Academic talent development programs: a best practices model

An Investigation of an Early College Entrance Program’s Ability to Impact Intellectual and Social Development

A Complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students

High Expectations, Limited Options: How Gifted Students Living in Poverty Approach the Demands of AP Coursework

Barriers to Underserved Students’ Participation in Gifted Programs and Possible Solutions

Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research

Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate Programs: Optimal Learning Environments for Talented Minorities?