Abstract:Purpose With rising globalization, Western and Eastern brands are increasingly collaborating and co-branding. Drawing on the theory of dialectical self that captures the degree of cognitive tendency to tolerate conflicts, inconsistencies and ambiguities in self-concept, this paper investigates the effect of consumer dialectical self on co-branding that encompasses Western and East Asian cultural brand personality traits. Design/methodology/approach Two studies were conducted using Chinese participants to examine the effects of the dialectical self on co-brand evaluation under single-and dual-personality conditions and to explore the mediating role of ideal social self-congruence and the moderating role of product type (high vs low conspicuous). Findings The findings suggest that counterintuitive to the received wisdom, the dialectical self negatively influences one's attitude towards a co-brand in the dual-personality condition only. Further, ideal social self-congruence mediates the relationship between the dialectical self and dual-personality co-brand evaluation in the high conspicuous product condition only. Practical implications Important implications are offered to international marketing managers for managing the dialectical self that lead to positive co-brand evaluations. Moreover, managers should highlight ideal social self-congruence for co-branding success for particular product types. Originality/value This paper examines co-branding from a novel perspective of consumer dialectical self and shows the pivotal role it plays when brands carry varying cultural traits engage in co-branding. By identifying the role of the dialectical self and the important mediator and moderator, the paper fulfils an important gap in co-branding literature and offers key implications.

Reframing the Cultural Differences between the East and the West

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Control Deprivation and Styles of Thinking

A longitudinal-experimental test of the panculturality of self-enhancement: Self-enhancement promotes psychological well-being both in the west and the east

Culture and Systems of Thought: Comparison of Holistic and Analytic Cognition

Explanations for cultural differences in thinking: Easterners’ dialectical thinking and Westerners’ linear thinking

Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition

Constructivist Self-Construal: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Culture, Control, and Perception of Relationships in the Environment.

East-West Revisited: Is Holistic Thinking Relational Thinking?

Collaboration between East and West: influence of consumer dialectical self on attitude towards co-brand personality traits

A Cross-Cultural Study on the Cognitive Traits That Affect Hindsight Bias —Focusing on Holistic-Analytic Thinking and Conservatism

Cultural Differences In The Self: From Philosophy To Psychology And Neuroscience

Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

Dialectical Self-Esteem and East-West Differences in Psychological Well-Being.

Beyond the 'East-West' Dichotomy: Global Variation in Cultural Models of Selfhood.

Cultural Differences In Thinking Styles

Morality through the lens of Confucian heritage countries: collective self variations and moral worldviews

Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology.

Myth of the Most Frequently Used Cultural Frames: A Critical Look at Individualism/Collectivism and Independent/Interdependent Self-Construals

Toward an explanation of cultural differences in subjective well-being: the role of positive emotion norms and positive illusions