Abstract:Culture is a human universal, yet it is a source of variation in human psychology, behaviour and development. Developmental researchers are now expanding the geographical scope of research to include populations beyond relatively wealthy Western communities. However, culture and context still play a secondary role in the theoretical grounding of developmental psychology research, far too often. In this paper, we highlight four false assumptions that are common in psychology, and that detract from the quality of both standard and cross-cultural research in development. These assumptions are: (i) the universality assumption , that empirical uniformity is evidence for universality, while any variation is evidence for culturally derived variation; (ii) the Western centrality assumption , that Western populations represent a normal and/or healthy standard against which development in all societies can be compared; (iii) the deficit assumption , that population-level differences in developmental timing or outcomes are necessarily due to something lacking among non-Western populations; and (iv) the equivalency assumption , that using identical research methods will necessarily produce equivalent and externally valid data, across disparate cultural contexts. For each assumption, we draw on cultural evolutionary theory to critique and replace the assumption with a theoretically grounded approach to culture in development. We support these suggestions with positive examples drawn from research in development. Finally, we conclude with a call for researchers to take reasonable steps towards more fully incorporating culture and context into studies of development, by expanding their participant pools in strategic ways. This will lead to a more inclusive and therefore more accurate description of human development. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Bridging cultural gaps: interdisciplinary studies in human cultural evolution’.

Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology.

Culture, Social Class, and Independence-Interdependence: the Case of Chinese Adolescents

The Impact of Modern and Postmodern Thinking on Psychological Counseling and Beyond

Beyond the 'East-West' Dichotomy: Global Variation in Cultural Models of Selfhood.

Globalization, culture and psychology

Conceptualizing psychological processes in response to globalization: Components, antecedents, and consequences of global orientations.

A Cultural Psychology of Agency: Morality, Motivation, and Reciprocity

WEIRD–Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology’s evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation.

Multiculturalism: A paradigmatic force in psychology.

Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

Variation is the universal: making cultural evolution work in developmental psychology

Reframing the Cultural Differences between the East and the West

How Different Regional Cultures (and Immigration) Affect People's Perception and Coping with Adversity

The behavioral ecology of cultural psychological variation.

Cultural Identity in the Horizon of Psychology

Confidentiality, informed consent, and multiple relationships in four emerging regions

Indigenization and Beyond: Methodological Relationalism in the Study of Personality Across Cultural Traditions

Culture Changes How We Think About Thinking: From “Human Inference” to “Geography of Thought”

The Western psychologization of global development: A cultural and decolonial approach

Culture, Influence, and the “I-ness” of Me: Commentary on Papers by Susan Bodnar, Gary B. Walls, and Steven Botticelli

The Chinese Experience of Rapid Modernization: Sociocultural Changes, Psychological Consequences?