Evaluation of temperature-based Penman–Monteith (TPM) model under the humid environment

P. K. Pandey,Vanita Pandey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0204-9
2016-08-09
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
Abstract:In this study, an attempt is made to check the suitability of TPM approach and present software to estimate reference evapotranspiration based on TPM and Hargreaves–Samani (HS) method by using Visual Basic Environment. Considering the FAO-56 Penman–Monteith (FAOPM) as the standard model, the comparative performances of selected methods were evaluated under the climatic condition of Umaim, Meghalaya, India. Using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE)’ and ‘correlation coefficient (r)’ as statistical measures of ‘goodness-of-fit’ the regression analysis was carried out. Based on the regression analysis TPM (RMSE = 0.014 mm day−1, r = 0.92) was found better followed by HS (RMSE = 0.054 mm day−1, r = 0.87). The average overestimate (e.g. 1.97 %) by TPM were found to be in close agreement with the FAOPM. These results support the use of the TPM approach under limiting climatic data conditions for Umaim.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?