Comparison and Modification of Evapotranspiration Estimation Method in Upper Hanjiang Basin

张东,张万昌,徐全芝
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2005.01.017
2005-01-01
Abstract:Five different evapotranspiration (ET_0) estimation methods, namely: Penman-Monteith (PM), Pristley-Taylor (PT), Hargreaves, FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO PM) and De Bruin, have been used to evaluate the validity and precision of simulated ET_0 results with the observed meteorological data from 13 weather stations in upper Hanjiang basin. The objective of this article is to find the best method among them and made further improvement on it to get a higher simulation precision on ET_0 simulation in study area. Based on four analysis index study such as correlation coefficient, explanation variance (EV), Nash-Sutcliffe Criterion (NSC) and correlation curve slope for the simulated results and the real ones calculated by 20-cm evaporating dish values with evaporation pan coefficient, PM and FAO PM methods are thought of better methods to yield rather satisfied estimation among the five selected approaches for and FAO PM methods considered both energy balance and water vapor diffusive theory in ET_0 simulation model construction while other three methods only considered latter elements. But the results also showed that PM method was better in correlation coefficient and EV indexes while FAO PM method is better in NSC and correlation curve slope indexes. In order to find the most favorable method among them, detailed studies have been done and the results show that FAO PM method has some shortcomings in calculation of the middle-process parameters. For example the simulated saturated water vapor in FAO PM method is lower than observed real water vapor value and the calculated solar radiation is larger than observed one. These will bring errors for some sub-processes simulation in hydrological studies. Therefore, PM method is recommended as the best ET_0 estimation approach in upper Hanjiang basin. The final precision of ET_0 by PM approach is further improved by introducing elevation modification to the simulated results. The coefficient between correlation curve slope and station elevations has reached 0.966. After elevation modification the magnitude of simulated ET_0 can be very near to the observed pint-sized evapotranspiration value.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?