Abstract:The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), a widely used watershed hydrology and water quality model, provides three different methods (Hargreaves, Priestley-Taylor, and Penman-Monteith) for estimating potential evapotranspiration (PET) and the corresponding actual evapotranspiration (AET). Although these methods have been extensively tested, the effects of using them within SWAT's framework are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to test the three PET methods within SWAT's framework using data collected in the Wild Rice River watershed, located in northwestern Minnesota. The performance of the SWAT models was measured using three statistics: the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (E-j(2)), coefficient of determination (R-2), and performance virtue (PVk). The three models were independently calibrated and validated using the observed daily stream flows at two USGS gauging stations. The simulated stream discharges were compared with the corresponding observed values and the estimated evapotranspiration examined in accordance with the wet-environment areal evapotranspiration (E-TW) derived from the evaporation data for Williams Lake, located about 100 km southeast of the study watershed. The use of the three PET methods resulted in different values for two calibration parameters, namely the soil evaporation compensation factor and SCS curve number At the lower station, which is near the watershed outlet, the observed annual mean discharge (8.33 m(3)/s) during the model validation period was predicted to be 10.25, 10.87, and 9.69 m(3)/s by SWAT-Penman, SWAT-Priestley, and SWAT Hargreaves, respectively. The annual mean discharge (10.83 m(3)/s) was more accurately predicted during the model calibration period, with an absolute error of less than 0.5 m(3)/s. The prediction errors for the upper station were comparable with those for the lower station. In addition, all three models exhibited good performance when simulating the monthly, seasonal, and annual mean discharges (E-j(2) > 0.75 and PVk > 0.80) and satisfactory performance when predicting the daily stream flows (E-j(2) > 0.36 and PVk > 0.70). In estimating evapotranspiration for the study watershed, SWAT-Hargreaves seemed to be slightly superior to the other two models, while SWAT-Priestley might be more appropriate for an E-TW value greater than 8.0 mm/d. Nevertheless, the AET values estimated by the three models shared a concurrent spatial pattern and temporal trend, and were insignificantly different from each other at a 5% significance level (p-values > 0.05). The results indicated that after calibration, using the three ET methods within SWAT produced very similar hydrologic (AET and discharge) predictions for the study watershed.

Comparison of an improved Penman-Monteith model and SWH model for estimating evapotranspiration in a meadow wetland in a semiarid region

Improving a Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration Model by Incorporating Soil Moisture Control on Soil Evaporation in Semiarid Areas

Improvement of evapotranspiration simulation study in the Hailar River basin under the influence of vegetation dynamics

Simulation of evapotranspiration and its components for the mobile dune using an improved dual-source model in semi-arid regions

Intercomparison of remote sensing-based models for estimation of evapotranspiration and accuracy assessment based on SWAT

The estimation and partitioning of evapotranspiration in a coniferous plantation in subtropical China

A comparative study of three stomatal conductance models for estimating evapotranspiration in a dune ecosystem in a semi-arid region

Estimating and partitioning evapotranspiration in a film mulched cropland with shallow groundwater by the improved dual source model

Estimating evapotranspiration within a dryland watershed: comparison of eddy‐covariance observations, water budget estimates, and satellite‐based products

Bayesian Performance Evaluation of Evapotranspiration Models Based on Eddy Covariance Systems in an Arid Region

Bayesian Performance Evaluation of Evapotranspiration Models for an Arid Region in Northwestern China

Using Precipitation, Vertical Root Distribution, and Satellite‐retrieved Vegetation Information to Parameterize Water Stress in a Penman‐Monteith Approach to Evapotranspiration Modeling under Mediterranean Climate

The Modification and Application of Basin Evapotranspiration Simulation Module in Avswat2000 Distributed Hydrological Model

Comparison of Elm, Gann, Wnn and Empirical Models for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in Humid Region of Southwest China

Influences of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods on SWAT's Hydrologic Simulation in a Northwestern Minnesota Watershed

Improvement of Evapotranspiration Simulation in a Physically Based Ecohydrological Model for the Groundwater–soil–plant–atmosphere Continuum

A Hybrid Dual-Source Model of Estimating Evapotranspiration over Different Ecosystems and Implications for Satellite-Based Approaches

Comparison of Evapotranspiration Estimates Based on the Surface Water Balance, Modified Penman‐Monteith Model, and Reanalysis Data Sets for Continental China

A General Predictive Model for Estimating Monthly Ecosystem Evapotranspiration

Estimating and Validating Soil Evaporation and Crop Transpiration During the HiWATER-MUSOEXE

A Promising Tool to Determine Daily Et by Monitoring Soil Water Changes Caused by Evapotranspiration in the Hilly and Gully Regions of the Loess Plateau